@apeckofpickles.bsky.social
I’ve never heard anybody ever say anything other than @@.
Or I have and filtered them out.
Or I have and filtered them out.
December 28, 2025 at 3:07 AM
I’ve never heard anybody ever say anything other than @@.
Or I have and filtered them out.
Or I have and filtered them out.
I understand the clip marketing aspect. But what share of “listens” are actually people watching?
I’ve never watched a podcast on video (I listen while doing other things). My wife will sometimes play through YouTube on TV but she’s never actually looking at it.
I’ve never watched a podcast on video (I listen while doing other things). My wife will sometimes play through YouTube on TV but she’s never actually looking at it.
December 27, 2025 at 10:48 PM
I understand the clip marketing aspect. But what share of “listens” are actually people watching?
I’ve never watched a podcast on video (I listen while doing other things). My wife will sometimes play through YouTube on TV but she’s never actually looking at it.
I’ve never watched a podcast on video (I listen while doing other things). My wife will sometimes play through YouTube on TV but she’s never actually looking at it.
They’re planning to do this in the next five days?
December 27, 2025 at 12:09 AM
They’re planning to do this in the next five days?
I thought I was, but have taken the fact that I keep completely forgetting there’s new stuff to watch as a sign that possibly I’m never going to get around to it.
December 26, 2025 at 6:30 PM
I thought I was, but have taken the fact that I keep completely forgetting there’s new stuff to watch as a sign that possibly I’m never going to get around to it.
Feel strangely compelled to chime in with “where I’m from we call that a biscuit” for no good reason.
December 26, 2025 at 4:05 AM
Feel strangely compelled to chime in with “where I’m from we call that a biscuit” for no good reason.
And in Zootopia land they apparently don’t expire.
December 26, 2025 at 1:14 AM
And in Zootopia land they apparently don’t expire.
I thought he did a great job but the movie definitely lost me before the turn.
When gunplay started I was actively rooting for him to get shot ahead of the gangster.
When gunplay started I was actively rooting for him to get shot ahead of the gangster.
December 25, 2025 at 11:09 PM
I thought he did a great job but the movie definitely lost me before the turn.
When gunplay started I was actively rooting for him to get shot ahead of the gangster.
When gunplay started I was actively rooting for him to get shot ahead of the gangster.
But they don’t expect anybody to do something for them, that’s why they’re paying people to do it.
December 25, 2025 at 8:03 PM
But they don’t expect anybody to do something for them, that’s why they’re paying people to do it.
Think someone got a bit captured by the jargon of the explainer.
When my engineers say something is unreliable there’s no pejorative in it. They just mean something that might happen, but that it can’t be assumed it will.
That word didn’t trigger for me at all, until I saw your post.
When my engineers say something is unreliable there’s no pejorative in it. They just mean something that might happen, but that it can’t be assumed it will.
That word didn’t trigger for me at all, until I saw your post.
December 25, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Think someone got a bit captured by the jargon of the explainer.
When my engineers say something is unreliable there’s no pejorative in it. They just mean something that might happen, but that it can’t be assumed it will.
That word didn’t trigger for me at all, until I saw your post.
When my engineers say something is unreliable there’s no pejorative in it. They just mean something that might happen, but that it can’t be assumed it will.
That word didn’t trigger for me at all, until I saw your post.
Die Hard 1 is dated because of the bearer bonds.
Now if the Nakatomi Corporation had that volume of bearer bonds on site I’d automatically assume they’re the bad guys and the Gruber Gang is come to expose them.
Now if the Nakatomi Corporation had that volume of bearer bonds on site I’d automatically assume they’re the bad guys and the Gruber Gang is come to expose them.
December 25, 2025 at 5:45 PM
Die Hard 1 is dated because of the bearer bonds.
Now if the Nakatomi Corporation had that volume of bearer bonds on site I’d automatically assume they’re the bad guys and the Gruber Gang is come to expose them.
Now if the Nakatomi Corporation had that volume of bearer bonds on site I’d automatically assume they’re the bad guys and the Gruber Gang is come to expose them.
Also, it appears that Stephen Miller has the ability to have any personal returned from CECOT at any time he (or maybe a court) says it should be done.
December 24, 2025 at 11:53 PM
Also, it appears that Stephen Miller has the ability to have any personal returned from CECOT at any time he (or maybe a court) says it should be done.
He didn’t make the offer to me, but if 60 Minutes is willing to hire me for a bit, I volunteer.
Only condition is that person can’t be deported again afterward without their consent as to destination.
Only condition is that person can’t be deported again afterward without their consent as to destination.
December 24, 2025 at 11:50 PM
He didn’t make the offer to me, but if 60 Minutes is willing to hire me for a bit, I volunteer.
Only condition is that person can’t be deported again afterward without their consent as to destination.
Only condition is that person can’t be deported again afterward without their consent as to destination.
I don’t get the “it’s slow and boring” complaints.
Assuming you’re talking about what I assume you’re talking about.
Assuming you’re talking about what I assume you’re talking about.
December 24, 2025 at 3:31 AM
I don’t get the “it’s slow and boring” complaints.
Assuming you’re talking about what I assume you’re talking about.
Assuming you’re talking about what I assume you’re talking about.
Haven’t seen anybody actually dispute she has the authority to pull the story so seems a straw man.
December 24, 2025 at 2:11 AM
Haven’t seen anybody actually dispute she has the authority to pull the story so seems a straw man.
I think a movie can be so bad it’s fun.
And a lot of people think fun is the same as good.
I’m not of those people.
And a lot of people think fun is the same as good.
I’m not of those people.
December 23, 2025 at 10:29 PM
I think a movie can be so bad it’s fun.
And a lot of people think fun is the same as good.
I’m not of those people.
And a lot of people think fun is the same as good.
I’m not of those people.
I’m going g to go back to “absentee ballots” regardless of reason being used.
December 23, 2025 at 4:31 PM
I’m going g to go back to “absentee ballots” regardless of reason being used.
Fortunately you’ve found the only time ever that usage in language isn’t supported by internal logic.
I’m sure it’ll be corrected immediately.
I’m sure it’ll be corrected immediately.
December 23, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Fortunately you’ve found the only time ever that usage in language isn’t supported by internal logic.
I’m sure it’ll be corrected immediately.
I’m sure it’ll be corrected immediately.
Yeah, but THIS TIME it’s different. Because I’m old and know what all those other numbers mean.
December 23, 2025 at 4:04 PM
Yeah, but THIS TIME it’s different. Because I’m old and know what all those other numbers mean.
The act of someone who has always been on the “asked for comment” side of the process not the “asking for comment” side.
I’m sure many times she has felt aggrieved at being told a story was going to run involving her regardless of whether she participated.
I’m sure many times she has felt aggrieved at being told a story was going to run involving her regardless of whether she participated.
December 22, 2025 at 2:44 PM
The act of someone who has always been on the “asked for comment” side of the process not the “asking for comment” side.
I’m sure many times she has felt aggrieved at being told a story was going to run involving her regardless of whether she participated.
I’m sure many times she has felt aggrieved at being told a story was going to run involving her regardless of whether she participated.
Never seen them in person and those don’t really look like what I’ve seen in pictures.
Wouldn’t have called them a biscuit. But also don’t look like any pancake I’ve ever eaten.
But I accept that they are and don’t feel the need to tell people their words are wrong.
Wouldn’t have called them a biscuit. But also don’t look like any pancake I’ve ever eaten.
But I accept that they are and don’t feel the need to tell people their words are wrong.
December 22, 2025 at 2:42 AM
Never seen them in person and those don’t really look like what I’ve seen in pictures.
Wouldn’t have called them a biscuit. But also don’t look like any pancake I’ve ever eaten.
But I accept that they are and don’t feel the need to tell people their words are wrong.
Wouldn’t have called them a biscuit. But also don’t look like any pancake I’ve ever eaten.
But I accept that they are and don’t feel the need to tell people their words are wrong.
So they’d bought the signage before doing the vote yesterday?
December 19, 2025 at 6:47 PM
So they’d bought the signage before doing the vote yesterday?
But much more deniable/hearsay.
December 18, 2025 at 8:38 PM
But much more deniable/hearsay.
If the fewer blue aliens and more terminator are in the same movie I admit I’ll be intrigued.
December 17, 2025 at 6:04 PM
If the fewer blue aliens and more terminator are in the same movie I admit I’ll be intrigued.
I would have thought Schwarber watched a lot more home run than that.
December 17, 2025 at 1:13 AM
I would have thought Schwarber watched a lot more home run than that.
I mostly watched Buffy this way.
December 17, 2025 at 1:10 AM
I mostly watched Buffy this way.