apatrida.bsky.social
@apatrida.bsky.social
Kotlin has big numbers for server-side development, at least the same level as mobile app. So that's big enough of a role.
January 29, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Kotlin has big numbers for server-side development, at least the same level as mobile app. So that's big enough of a role.
String versus code points.
You can look at github.com/cketti/kotli... for ideas (or use this library) to always work in code points instead.
You can look at github.com/cketti/kotli... for ideas (or use this library) to always work in code points instead.
January 29, 2025 at 6:12 PM
String versus code points.
You can look at github.com/cketti/kotli... for ideas (or use this library) to always work in code points instead.
You can look at github.com/cketti/kotli... for ideas (or use this library) to always work in code points instead.
to be clear, they are cash trees at billion users, but to get there, you'll burn money endlessly.
December 7, 2024 at 3:43 AM
to be clear, they are cash trees at billion users, but to get there, you'll burn money endlessly.
Have you modeled how to make money with a social network? It isn't a cash tree.
December 7, 2024 at 3:36 AM
Have you modeled how to make money with a social network? It isn't a cash tree.
Will, what are your thoughts on identity.foundation/didwebvh/next/ updated to did:web?
The did:webvh DID Method -- did:web + Verifiable History
identity.foundation
December 5, 2024 at 2:13 PM
Will, what are your thoughts on identity.foundation/didwebvh/next/ updated to did:web?
Well, there is a new one advancing did:web called did:webvh
identity.foundation/didwebvh/next/
and the SCID part of the identifier is stable. Yet AT is unlikely to look at it either.
identity.foundation/didwebvh/next/
and the SCID part of the identifier is stable. Yet AT is unlikely to look at it either.
The did:webvh DID Method -- did:web + Verifiable History
identity.foundation
December 5, 2024 at 2:13 PM
Well, there is a new one advancing did:web called did:webvh
identity.foundation/didwebvh/next/
and the SCID part of the identifier is stable. Yet AT is unlikely to look at it either.
identity.foundation/didwebvh/next/
and the SCID part of the identifier is stable. Yet AT is unlikely to look at it either.
I brought it into a reply here:
github.com/bluesky-soci...
they are slow to try and understand the new options (did:webvh and did:dht) or mostly I think it comes down to "we don't have an issue for us, so it isn't a priority" even though there are significant issues being asked about.
github.com/bluesky-soci...
they are slow to try and understand the new options (did:webvh and did:dht) or mostly I think it comes down to "we don't have an issue for us, so it isn't a priority" even though there are significant issues being asked about.
Migrating from `did:plc` to `did:web` · bluesky-social atproto · Discussion #2705
Hi folks! I've signed up for Bluesky a while back in the past, but am really interested in the idea of hosting my identity in a more decentralised manner (largely for geek-cred than anything else)....
github.com
December 5, 2024 at 2:10 PM
I brought it into a reply here:
github.com/bluesky-soci...
they are slow to try and understand the new options (did:webvh and did:dht) or mostly I think it comes down to "we don't have an issue for us, so it isn't a priority" even though there are significant issues being asked about.
github.com/bluesky-soci...
they are slow to try and understand the new options (did:webvh and did:dht) or mostly I think it comes down to "we don't have an issue for us, so it isn't a priority" even though there are significant issues being asked about.