Apatheia
LightNews LightNews
banner
apatheia.bsky.social
Apatheia
@apatheia.bsky.social
170 followers 320 following 170 posts
MA in philosophy. Deeply interested in Psychoanalysis, Ethics, History of Philosophy, and Political and Social Philosophy. The aim has to be emancipation! Also, a Katheryn Hahn Appreciator.
Posts Replies Media Videos
apatheia.bsky.social
When I use someone else's device to go online and they don't use adblockers:
March 6, 2025 at 6:04 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
February 10, 2025 at 7:53 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
February 10, 2025 at 6:15 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
February 9, 2025 at 6:48 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
February 6, 2025 at 8:59 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
February 2, 2025 at 11:28 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
February 2, 2025 at 8:36 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
January 31, 2025 at 10:13 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
Gadamer:
January 31, 2025 at 5:46 AM
apatheia.bsky.social
January 28, 2025 at 7:33 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
January 26, 2025 at 6:28 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
In these conditions, one can well understand the “ urgent task” that constitutes philosophy in Paul Ricoeur’s eyes, an answer to the question: what is it to be human? The answer to this question, he says in the opening lines of the text we have placed first in this col­ lection, is not that of “the human sciences,” which “ find themselves dispersed among disparate disciplines and literally do not know what it is they are talking about.” But neither is the task that of an “ontol­ogy” that, under the influence of Heidegger, thinks there is nothing to learn from these same sciences and remains, therefore, too general and indeterminate. Instead it consists in an ever renewed effort to make sense of these disciplines in terms of one other. On the one side, in effect, philosophy cannot dispense with a radical interroga­ tion into the being of human being. This interrogation, which begins with Plato, shows that anthropology has an older history than the disciplines which dispute among themselves in its name - a properly philosophical history that justifies the sought-for handholds Ricoeur looks for in this thinker but also in Aristotle, Pascal, Spinoza, Kant, Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger, to name only those he most often calls upon. On the other side, though, philosophy cannot deprive itself of the resources of the human sciences nor act as though they have contributed nothing, despite the fragmentary image they give of human beings, to the exploration of their being. Ricoeur’s dia­ logue with psychoanalysis bears exemplary witness to this, as does his interest in history, sociology, and the sciences of language.2 His relation to structural anthropology, to be sure, appears more diffi­ cult. He does not follow Levi-Strauss when he, in wholly rejecting traditional philosophy, affirms the same ambition and claims to construe logically the invariants of both mind and culture.
January 24, 2025 at 2:10 AM
apatheia.bsky.social
January 23, 2025 at 7:18 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
it is what it is
January 22, 2025 at 5:35 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
evergreen
January 20, 2025 at 7:34 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
January 20, 2025 at 5:21 AM
apatheia.bsky.social
January 14, 2025 at 6:51 AM
apatheia.bsky.social
January 10, 2025 at 7:41 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
December 31, 2024 at 5:29 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
tru
December 26, 2024 at 11:15 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
December 19, 2024 at 8:16 PM
apatheia.bsky.social
December 13, 2024 at 4:27 AM
apatheia.bsky.social
December 9, 2024 at 1:11 AM
apatheia.bsky.social
December 9, 2024 at 1:02 AM
apatheia.bsky.social
December 9, 2024 at 1:01 AM