@aosterheld.bsky.social
Look at ECF 200 22-23 and the attached exhibit. The full grand jury never saw or voted on the edited version. This is from their own filing.
November 21, 2025 at 5:31 AM
Look at ECF 200 22-23 and the attached exhibit. The full grand jury never saw or voted on the edited version. This is from their own filing.
Halligan didn’t even sign this filing (she doesn’t sign most but she was only prosecutor present).
November 20, 2025 at 11:26 PM
Halligan didn’t even sign this filing (she doesn’t sign most but she was only prosecutor present).
Marathon! Thanks for staying the course.
November 20, 2025 at 10:41 PM
Marathon! Thanks for staying the course.
Halligan didn’t sign this filing, the others weren’t there and just citing transcripts. But most of GJ and court reporter had been released before edited indictment came back.
November 20, 2025 at 10:32 PM
Halligan didn’t sign this filing, the others weren’t there and just citing transcripts. But most of GJ and court reporter had been released before edited indictment came back.
His favorite topic
November 20, 2025 at 6:52 PM
His favorite topic
Can you imagine what his session would sound like?
November 20, 2025 at 6:12 PM
Can you imagine what his session would sound like?
From what I've read, most of the drug traffic in the Caribbean island hops to a large port and ends up in Europe and W Africa. There were a few boats destroyed in the Pacific after Columbia criticized the US action.
November 20, 2025 at 3:37 PM
From what I've read, most of the drug traffic in the Caribbean island hops to a large port and ends up in Europe and W Africa. There were a few boats destroyed in the Pacific after Columbia criticized the US action.
I thought Maggie Cleary was involved in editing the indictment. She was reportedly present when indictment was presented, but sitting in back, not at government’s table.
November 20, 2025 at 12:23 AM
I thought Maggie Cleary was involved in editing the indictment. She was reportedly present when indictment was presented, but sitting in back, not at government’s table.
Is that because it mostly involved allegations from after Richman was no longer at FBI? If he was properly there when he left.
November 19, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Is that because it mostly involved allegations from after Richman was no longer at FBI? If he was properly there when he left.
Cleary was fired the next day despite being the only person from the EDVA who helped a bit. Maybe she realized what was done was improper (lack of presentation).
November 19, 2025 at 10:00 PM
Cleary was fired the next day despite being the only person from the EDVA who helped a bit. Maybe she realized what was done was improper (lack of presentation).
Not a great style but there are judges whose prose is much more difficult to read.
November 18, 2025 at 8:54 PM
Not a great style but there are judges whose prose is much more difficult to read.
The economic impact of reducing immigration is even larger, increases the aging of the population, challenges for Social Security and Medicare, and harms local economies by reducing workers & demand for goods & services.
November 18, 2025 at 6:21 PM
The economic impact of reducing immigration is even larger, increases the aging of the population, challenges for Social Security and Medicare, and harms local economies by reducing workers & demand for goods & services.
Hate the tie
November 18, 2025 at 2:09 AM
Hate the tie
No hearing, will decide based on briefing. Seems likely outcome will be the obvious.
November 18, 2025 at 1:51 AM
No hearing, will decide based on briefing. Seems likely outcome will be the obvious.
One indictment , two pieces. But how was there communication while GJ was deliberating? And no recorder is still an issue.
November 17, 2025 at 10:38 PM
One indictment , two pieces. But how was there communication while GJ was deliberating? And no recorder is still an issue.
Technically, he implies she didn’t present two to the GJ. Which may be true. Of course, that’s what she should have done.
November 17, 2025 at 10:05 PM
Technically, he implies she didn’t present two to the GJ. Which may be true. Of course, that’s what she should have done.
If you’re gonna face plant, make it an epic face plant.
November 17, 2025 at 5:53 PM
If you’re gonna face plant, make it an epic face plant.
That opinion should definitely be read to understand what a clusterf this has been.
November 17, 2025 at 5:32 PM
That opinion should definitely be read to understand what a clusterf this has been.
Probably should be given partial credit
November 16, 2025 at 1:40 AM
Probably should be given partial credit
The draft rules that she should send them to Chief Judge's office is new, also that CJ told them to not make arrest in public hallway. BTW, there is video from various cameras in the hallway and first floor that show the incident.
November 15, 2025 at 1:14 AM
The draft rules that she should send them to Chief Judge's office is new, also that CJ told them to not make arrest in public hallway. BTW, there is video from various cameras in the hallway and first floor that show the incident.
It’s a procedural decision related to circumstances that have changed. Boasberg is free to proceed with contempt proceedings
November 14, 2025 at 10:19 PM
It’s a procedural decision related to circumstances that have changed. Boasberg is free to proceed with contempt proceedings
Most feds won’t let even you buy them a Coke.
November 14, 2025 at 7:07 PM
Most feds won’t let even you buy them a Coke.
Fake judiciary, fake justice. During his tenure, 35 of 35 precedential decisions have sided with ICE. Quelle surprise.
November 14, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Fake judiciary, fake justice. During his tenure, 35 of 35 precedential decisions have sided with ICE. Quelle surprise.