That may mean that a bunch of students don't actually engage.

So far I plan to let students propose 1-2 sentence additions to the list, and for others to vote for contributions.

Then at the end, I assemble the sheet from the most voted contributions.

Will you also remove "would you like me to do X next?"

Firstly, amazing! I've seen that builds against pre-release version started much earlier, and that's awesome!

NB, there's draft text remaining in the post: "With yesterday's release of Python 3.14 (insert release link)"

The decision seems to strongly depend on the review quality, difficulty of prompt design, and the accuracy of the genAI result.

- How likely is a researcher to be able to generate an appropriate high quality prompt?
- How would one establish validity of the genAI output?

Even the best general purpose LLMs struggle with niche knowledge. This is why I think such a tool can make a big difference. At the same time, the available open AI tools are already impressive, and I expect that they will prove amazingly useful.

I have to ask: did the agent come up with this blackboard? Seems only tangentially related to arachnophobia, but definitely anxiety-inducing.

Hour 3+: ok you've no idea, let me show you how it is actually done.