You don’t have any arguments, all you have is insults.

I’m not lying, I’m telling the truth. Capitalism is a system where the wealthy make profit by paying workers low wages and taking the rest.

You are more likely to create someone who will suffer for no good reason than create someone who will solve all the world’s problems.

How about you actually try to give justifications instead of appealing to intuition and instinct.

The absence of pleasure is not bad if someone doesn’t exist, so appealing to how nonexistent people are harmed by not being born is utter nonsense.

No I haven’t.

Your argument makes no sense. Potential people is only a theoretical concept. No one is harmed by not existing, because suffering requires existence. The absence of pleasure is only bad if someone exists to suffer from that absence.

Suffering is inherently bad. Suffering is an inherently negative feeling that sentient beings have. Good and bad ultimately come down to how it makes us feel and how our actions will make others feel.

That’s not true because procreation is an instinct that even animals have. Animals don’t consider the ethics of procreation, and most human don’t really either. Humans already have an evolutionary bias towards procreation. So you need to provide logical justifications instead.

Yes, it is inherently good for suffering to not be experienced.

All life forms that can experience suffering.

To justify procreation, you have to justify all the potential suffering that could occur. Can you give me a good a justification for this? I don’t think it is possible.