These entities regulate not only data but also the formation of desire, interest, and identity, demonstrating that ideology has ceased to be merely a discursive superstructure and has instead materialized as a technology of power embedded within algorithmic rationality. (6/6)

technocapitalist actors platform monopolies such as Meta, Google, and Amazon. (5/6)

This produces a new form of labor in which the individual is not only a producer but also the object of production: data-labor. In this regard, Marx’s assertion that “the means of intellectual production are in the hands of the ruling class” can be reinterpreted through contemporary (4/6)

education, or religion, being represented today by digital platforms, algorithmic infrastructures, and data regimes. Digital capitalism subjects both consciousness and processes of subject formation to market dynamics through the commodification of information, affect, and attention. (3/6)

normative order that permeates all spheres of social existence from personal relationships to digital practices of subjectivity. In this context, Marx’s concept of the “control of the means of intellectual production” extends beyond classical ideological apparatuses such as the press, (2/6)

+ This finding points to a significant threshold in the development of abstract thinking, self-awareness, and symbolic expression during the Neolithic period.”

“The T-shaped stele with a human face motif uncovered at Karahantepe (c. 10,000 BCE) combines monumental form with human representation, making it one of the earliest known examples in human history. +

28. Tisini's book on the conceptions of matter in Islamic thought is far better executed than Bloch's "Aristotelian Left." Yet the former remains almost entirely forgotten, while the latter is well read and widely translated. More translations of Tisini's works from Arabic are much needed.