anthropicaeon.bsky.social
@anthropicaeon.bsky.social
Because if you actually looked, Steve claimed two times, one through an article and one through a twitter post that he will be stepping back from engaging with the Crypto community. This caused people to sell off because they took it as a dev taking away his support from the coin.
January 19, 2026 at 9:34 PM
Why are you speaker for Kelsey? Does the stock market not rely on people's greed through speculation? This is open market 101
January 19, 2026 at 3:00 AM
You don't get that nocode is a meme and crypto communities have been built off memes? In this specific instance it's obviously a joke. In instances with other GitHub repos there's obviously a distinction
January 19, 2026 at 2:57 AM
If you don't know what the Ralph Wiggum loop is that's okay, just means you aren't plugged into recent developments in AI. And that's fine lol
January 19, 2026 at 2:56 AM
Because I'm what world would Ralph Wiggum loop gotten 200k in donations? It doesn't, people will put more money towards a speculative coin that they could also profit from while also funding the creator through IP royalties.
January 19, 2026 at 1:50 AM
It's okay if you don't know what the Ralph Wiggum loop is Jerry. A quick Google search can tell you why it's helped a lot of Claude Code devs.
January 19, 2026 at 1:49 AM
They aren't hard set rules they are setting up expectations for people on how crypto communities operate and trying to onboard people the best way they can. For all intents and purposes you could just login and claim the money and leave.

Obviously it's more +EV to work with the community
January 19, 2026 at 1:34 AM
That's like a casino isn't it? Still people go to it and play their chances.
January 19, 2026 at 1:29 AM
What's real about someone who raises seed of a product that isn't built yet? Why is there an entire VC market based on what's not real?
January 19, 2026 at 1:28 AM
How about rewarding open-source developers and funding the creator community to build cool shit without the need of them being directly involved with the token?

Again look at Ralph Wiggum loop. Geoff was able to make 200k for an amazing piece of code without needing to deal with raising for it.
January 19, 2026 at 1:24 AM
Because I'm a believer in anonymity. It's literally a core crypto principle starting from Satoshi himself. How many crypto investors have gotten robbed? Why should I do something like that? Why does me revealing myself add credit to my words when code and reasoning should speak for itself?
January 19, 2026 at 1:23 AM
As I've said many times, I am an investor in the token and I made the account to clear up misconceptions of the app and the coin. What's the problem here?
January 19, 2026 at 1:12 AM
You also described stocks, housing market, literally any market who's price is determined by the market. Obviously our cycles are smaller because the liquidity in the market is smaller. There's also obviously been case studies where people who invested early reaped the rewards. What's the issue here
January 19, 2026 at 1:07 AM
Again, I've been fully transparent on why I made the account and what I'm doing. Try harder? Sure why not, since when was trying hard frowned upon?
January 19, 2026 at 1:05 AM
Who's dying on a crypto hill? I've said it time and time again, everyone who trades on the bags app is fully aware of the risks involved in the market we are in. "They're almost always Ponzi schemes and rug pulls" just sounds like someone who's opinion or crypto is built from media outlet slop.
January 19, 2026 at 1:04 AM
How is it suspicious? I'm being completely transparent that I'm an investor in the coin and am trying to clear up misconceptions of crypto.
January 19, 2026 at 1:03 AM
The 72 hours is important because they are trying to openly discuss how crypto communities work with as much transparency as possible.
January 19, 2026 at 12:58 AM
Yes it's hilarious and we find it hilarious too because speculative community thrives on memes and Kelsey's GitHub repo is the best "meme" of a repo.
January 19, 2026 at 12:57 AM
I don't work for bags. I'm being fully transparent in saying I bought the nocode token related his repo and am trying to dispell misconceptions about the app.
January 19, 2026 at 12:56 AM
x.com/GeoffreyHunt...

You can talk to Geoff if you'd like to confirm it's not a scam. Again he made the Ralph Wiggum loop, it got built into Claude Code. He supports the coin fully.

Your amount is going up because more people are buying and selling the token causing the volatility.
geoff (@GeoffreyHuntley) / X
geoff (@GeoffreyHuntley) / X
x.com
January 19, 2026 at 12:54 AM
Oh sorry didn't know Ralph Wiggum loop wasn't a value adding product to the Claude Code community.
January 19, 2026 at 12:44 AM
I'm hyping a crypto project? I'm defending and clearing up misconceptions that people have about the app. Like I said, most people know the risk of trading on the app and take it. Attacking me personally because you can't refute what I'm saying?
January 19, 2026 at 12:39 AM
That's only true for extremely high cap projects, when market cap is low and volatility is high you can't keep to the same expectations.
January 19, 2026 at 12:38 AM
No I wasn't, I am someone who bought the coin and want to clear the air about misconceptions of the app.
January 19, 2026 at 12:36 AM
As I've said, nearly everyone who trades on the Bags app is extremely cognizant on the risk that they taking investing in the coins. We aren't stupid, but we take a bet on volatility, virality and speculation. The ones who took that bet on Ralph won. Same with Gas Town. Even the GSD GitHub
January 19, 2026 at 12:36 AM