And then you had the GALL to claim I was "defending Coal" instead of calling them out for the trumped up grooming allegations YOU made. I wasn't defending shit, I was fighting you twisting my words for some petty spat I never wanted to be a part of to begin with.

It's interesting to me that you kept implying that there were signs of grooming in your new tweets, when in in your old messages you seemed to pretty clearly understand that this was the case of a minor lying about their age to flirt with adults.

And you claim that you had the situation explained to you by me and Coal, but that didn't stop you from using my own messages WARNING you to imply Coal was a groomer. Even when I showed you direct evidence you doubled down. You bounce between claiming ignorance and authority when it suits you.

Regardless of your intentions, you are an ADULT and what you did endangered them. It shouldn't be this hard for you to take even a modicum of responsibility for your actions and admit that what you did was wrong, but instead you avoided it, claimed it wasn't your responsibility, and ran away.

Don't worry, I didn't forget about you.

Glad to see you finally acknowledged this situation you acted like you weren't a part of-- after trying to change your name twice to avoid being associated with it.

Let's break down everything you left out or won't state on your own page.

Oh, you want to be an adult now?

ADULTS don't make false grooming allegations.

ADULTS don't endanger children.

ADULTS don't send this shit then delete it and change their name to run from the consequences of their actions.

Miss me with this "adult to adult" shit. You don't act like one.

I hope everyone realizes just how callous and incredibly dangerous this kind of response is to someone being told they actively endangered a child by encouraging them to engage sexually with adults. It was their actions and their responsibility.

This person is dangerous.

This user not only used me to try to falsely frame someone as a groomer, but they also refuse to accept or acknowledge any kind of responsiblity for defending said minor's actions (lying about their age to flirt with adults). Do not trust them.

This minor knew that they were going to be blocked, and tried to manipulate Coal into staying with them by threatening to commit suicide. If you actually just read the messages I posted you could see that.

You are still avoiding responsibility for encouraging the minor who was caught doing this.

THIS WAS RIGHT ABOVE YOUR TWEET WHERE YOU SAID YOU BELIEVED THEM TO BE AN ADULT.

So which is it? Do you not know about the situation enough to make any claims, even when the evidence was literally in front of you? Or do you know about it to imply Coal and I took part in grooming?

YOU, on the other hand, defended in the thread right under their tweets where they said they were a minor. Despite the fact that there were PUBLIC tweets in the thread showing them claiming to be a minor, you defended as said you believed they were an adult. That's what prompted me to talk to you.

Just like I told you in DMs, this person was being very manipulative and abusive to Coal, trying to guilt trip them into staying friends. While I don't like that Coal was hesitant to immediately block, at no point did they further enable this minor or flirt with them.

Specifically to flirt with adults. When this person and Coal flirted in a public thread, someone else came in to warn them because they uncovered buried tweets from earlier in the year where they claimed to be 16. This minor attempted to lie again but the tweets were still publicly visible.

I don't appreciate you pulling me into this, especially when you are misrepresenting a situation that you were a part of.

If you're going to post my DMs, why leave the part out where you defended a minor lying to adults about their age, and only blocking them when I told you that you should?

YOU, on the other hand, defended in the thread right under their tweets where they said they were a minor. Despite the fact that there were PUBLIC tweets in the thread showing them claiming to be a minor, you defended as said you believed they were an adult. That's what prompted me to talk to you.

Just like I told you in DMs, this person was being very manipulative and abusive to Coal, trying to guilt trip them into staying friends. While I don't like that Coal was hesitant to immediately block, at no point did they further enable this minor or flirt with them.

Specifically to flirt with adults. When this person and Coal flirted in a public thread, someone else came in to warn them because they uncovered buried tweets from earlier in the year where they claimed to be 16. This minor attempted to lie again but the tweets were still publicly visible.

I don't appreciate you pulling me into this, especially when you are misrepresenting a situation that you were a part of.

If you're going to post my DMs, why leave the part out where you defended a minor lying to adults about their age, and only blocking them when I told you that you should?