Annabel
annabelrob.bsky.social
Annabel
@annabelrob.bsky.social
Resident of Birmingham, UK; parent of two; works in offshore wind project management; was once a scientist - still has faith in experts. Supports liberal, interventionist government.
I should add I am making no assumptions about his immigration status, whether he proscribes any religion or his political/social views.
November 4, 2025 at 12:59 PM
I agree with your frustrations but worth considering that EVs are bigger as they need space for the batteries. So this would be (in part) a green vehicle tax
November 4, 2025 at 12:31 PM
The there’s the generational divide over the meaning of “slut”. Having to explain to my Boomer mum that she shouldn’t call my messy sister one and why was a memorable conversation!
October 24, 2025 at 12:55 PM
Is this the average a person would pay/recieve or the average society pays/receives? The latter suggesting weighting for size of population in each category - it will make a big difference as there aren’t many 90+ people.
October 10, 2025 at 6:05 AM
Also possible to phrase as “lots of Reform backs don’t actually know Reform’s policies”?
October 8, 2025 at 1:38 PM
I know, I know. But his defence and later claim was skin colour as a proxy for general uniformity: “We all want mixed communities”. The stats show he doesn’t see Indian, Pakistani, Caribbean, African, etc as mixed cultures. Ie only white/non white matters.
October 7, 2025 at 3:21 PM
In case there is any doubt, Handsworth’s ethnic mix is 25% Pakistani, 23% Indian, 10% Bangladeshi, 9% white, 8% black Caribbean, 8% Black African (and some other groups) - ignoring skin colour that is incredibly diverse (culture, religion, etc). So he *must* be meaning non-white skin colour.
October 7, 2025 at 9:33 AM
He says it’s not about skin colour but Handsworth’s ethnic mix is 25% Pakistani, 23% Indian, 10% Bangladeshi, 9% white, 8% black Caribbean, 8% Black African (and some other groups) - ignoring skin colour that is incredibly diverse (culture, religion, etc). So he *must* be meaning skin colour.
October 7, 2025 at 9:27 AM
I believe this makes sense if you see it as a route to cancelling the mid-terms - can’t hold elections if you are “at war”. And that fine to your base because you also have convinced them you would have won, if they were held…
October 1, 2025 at 5:52 AM
I think he’s building up the rhetoric ready to cancel the mid-terms “because America is at war” - I believe that’s the long term strategy here.
October 1, 2025 at 5:45 AM
I seem to have missed the “sharp leftward turn”!
September 28, 2025 at 2:19 PM
I think these poll miss the strength of feeling. A lot of people a dissatisfied with Starmer for sure but the numbers who hated Johnson and Truss were unprecedented. (Though Farage may replicate them). I don’t know, but I think this is a more mild dislike.
September 28, 2025 at 2:17 PM
His equivocal position is perfectly judged. His Trump-liking supporters/financiers see nothing to worry about while other Reform-leaning voters take comfort in the lack of explicit support. Surely the trick is to push him off the fence - having no view is not good enough. Then some get upset
September 24, 2025 at 12:21 PM
It’s an own goal for Phillipson. Many Labour members are deeply upset with the leadership and this biased support makes it really, really clear how to send a protest vote.
September 17, 2025 at 7:39 PM