This feels like the moment we decide who owns our digital selves. Are we headed for a world where you need a lawyer just to exist online?
Or maybe this is a business opportunity to automate the process.

And there's another twist: What if AI companies just pack up and leave Denmark? "Sorry, too much legal hassle here, we're moving to..." literally anywhere else.
Denmark gets protection but loses innovation. Nobody wins?

It gets worse. Remember when you clicked "I agree" to Instagram's 47-page Terms of Service? You might have already given them permission to use your face for AI training.
Oops. Danish law vs. your digital signature.
Who wins?

Picture this: Some AI company (Meta?) scraped your Instagram photos to train their model. Now people are making fake videos of you. How do you even prove that happened?
"Hey Meta, did you use my selfies?"

But I think this will be tricky.
Writing the rule is the easy part.
Actually stopping someone from deepfaking you? That's the nightmare.

Denmark is trying something wild: giving you legal ownership of your own face and voice. Like, literally making it illegal to use "you" without permission.
Your face = your property.

Wow! That's insane that they are purposely designed to not be transparent. As if most AI weren't black boxes to begin with...

Life was much simpler back then

Have you tried vibe-debugging, or better yet, what's your success rate with vibe-deployments?

If you believe this , then the 5-10 year software development learning curve just collapsed to hours.