Uncle Angus
@angusbeefson.bsky.social
Definitely a person with a stable mindset.
An aspiring artist in all forms.
Currently focusing on:
Traditional and digital art
Music composing
Song writing
3D modeling
Game designing
Keeping myself from detonating
Voice acting
Writing
Open DMs
An aspiring artist in all forms.
Currently focusing on:
Traditional and digital art
Music composing
Song writing
3D modeling
Game designing
Keeping myself from detonating
Voice acting
Writing
Open DMs
Okay, and I condemn that. But that’s not what we talked about. We talked about early settling Zionists. Not the current entitled settlers. Although this conflict is far from being one-sided.
March 31, 2025 at 6:57 AM
Okay, and I condemn that. But that’s not what we talked about. We talked about early settling Zionists. Not the current entitled settlers. Although this conflict is far from being one-sided.
It was a mistake on my part, they did plant Eucalyptus trees, but the objective remains the same. They planted a BUNCH of different trees in order to help develop the desert. And it worked, you can see it today.
Yes, some were not fitting and likely altered the eco-system which was already lacking.
Yes, some were not fitting and likely altered the eco-system which was already lacking.
March 31, 2025 at 6:56 AM
It was a mistake on my part, they did plant Eucalyptus trees, but the objective remains the same. They planted a BUNCH of different trees in order to help develop the desert. And it worked, you can see it today.
Yes, some were not fitting and likely altered the eco-system which was already lacking.
Yes, some were not fitting and likely altered the eco-system which was already lacking.
They planted Aleppo trees. And you keep re-wording it into something bad. “Draining local aquifers” was the SWAMPS. It did not come at expense of local villages and crop because the land they purchased was THEIRS and BARREN.
March 31, 2025 at 6:35 AM
They planted Aleppo trees. And you keep re-wording it into something bad. “Draining local aquifers” was the SWAMPS. It did not come at expense of local villages and crop because the land they purchased was THEIRS and BARREN.
Replacing olive trees with an invasive species? Yeah, they to grow a forest in the damn desert. Olive trees weren’t gonna cut it.
This is exactly stewardship, not to mention working and clearing out the swamps.
This is exactly stewardship, not to mention working and clearing out the swamps.
March 30, 2025 at 9:29 PM
Replacing olive trees with an invasive species? Yeah, they to grow a forest in the damn desert. Olive trees weren’t gonna cut it.
This is exactly stewardship, not to mention working and clearing out the swamps.
This is exactly stewardship, not to mention working and clearing out the swamps.
Have you read what I sent? Where are they salting land? Historically it doesn’t make sense. How are they both salting lands and placing invasive trees.
Heritage groves? If they were so important, why were they sold? If the Jews own the land, they can do whatever they want.
Heritage groves? If they were so important, why were they sold? If the Jews own the land, they can do whatever they want.
March 30, 2025 at 9:29 PM
Have you read what I sent? Where are they salting land? Historically it doesn’t make sense. How are they both salting lands and placing invasive trees.
Heritage groves? If they were so important, why were they sold? If the Jews own the land, they can do whatever they want.
Heritage groves? If they were so important, why were they sold? If the Jews own the land, they can do whatever they want.
The whole stewardship thing is kinda exactly what Zionists did. They bought land, which was deserted and barren, and worked it. Yes, there were some lands they bought from Arab landlords with crops, which resulted in the eviction of Arab workers.
www.kkl-jnf.org/second_decad...
www.kkl-jnf.org/second_decad...
The First Decade: 1901-1910 - Keren Kayemeth LeIsrael - KKL-JNF
www.kkl-jnf.org
March 30, 2025 at 8:12 AM
The whole stewardship thing is kinda exactly what Zionists did. They bought land, which was deserted and barren, and worked it. Yes, there were some lands they bought from Arab landlords with crops, which resulted in the eviction of Arab workers.
www.kkl-jnf.org/second_decad...
www.kkl-jnf.org/second_decad...
I somehow how doubt that. And I doubt any word Hamas utters.
March 29, 2025 at 9:02 PM
I somehow how doubt that. And I doubt any word Hamas utters.
We are… Screwed. I’m very confused by this step.
March 29, 2025 at 7:22 PM
We are… Screwed. I’m very confused by this step.
Disgusting… Sadly I don’t trust the UN to do anything. Or anyone for that man. We can only pray that the people in Russia will go for Putin’s head.
March 29, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Disgusting… Sadly I don’t trust the UN to do anything. Or anyone for that man. We can only pray that the people in Russia will go for Putin’s head.
I can feel the weight on her soul. A feeling so many do not have today who spew hate and death. I hope for better times.
March 29, 2025 at 7:16 PM
I can feel the weight on her soul. A feeling so many do not have today who spew hate and death. I hope for better times.
It’s just two blatantly different histories. Let’s say the Navajo were exiled from their land and spread out across continents, wishing one day to return. At a certain point, they, but by then, the Latin Americans settled there.
Do you think the Navajo would deserve a state of their own?
Do you think the Navajo would deserve a state of their own?
March 29, 2025 at 4:54 PM
It’s just two blatantly different histories. Let’s say the Navajo were exiled from their land and spread out across continents, wishing one day to return. At a certain point, they, but by then, the Latin Americans settled there.
Do you think the Navajo would deserve a state of their own?
Do you think the Navajo would deserve a state of their own?
That’s such a wrong question to ask. Nobody’s punishing Palestinians for what Moroccan’s did. Palestinian Arabs are met with consequences for their own actions.
And I’m not generalizing, there were those who didn’t participate. Sadly, they meet the same consequences as the perpetrators.
And I’m not generalizing, there were those who didn’t participate. Sadly, they meet the same consequences as the perpetrators.
March 29, 2025 at 4:35 PM
That’s such a wrong question to ask. Nobody’s punishing Palestinians for what Moroccan’s did. Palestinian Arabs are met with consequences for their own actions.
And I’m not generalizing, there were those who didn’t participate. Sadly, they meet the same consequences as the perpetrators.
And I’m not generalizing, there were those who didn’t participate. Sadly, they meet the same consequences as the perpetrators.
Which is my what we’re doing. The international community should review the Geneva convention, Israel is standing by all articles. UNLIKE HAMAS.
March 28, 2025 at 9:46 PM
Which is my what we’re doing. The international community should review the Geneva convention, Israel is standing by all articles. UNLIKE HAMAS.
Comparing what happened to the Native Americans and what happened in Palestine is so extremely narrow minded and oddly racist. There’s just no point taking you you.
March 28, 2025 at 9:45 PM
Comparing what happened to the Native Americans and what happened in Palestine is so extremely narrow minded and oddly racist. There’s just no point taking you you.
If you say the Nakba in 1948, then there’s no point talking to you as you leave out very vital context. But the biggest premise of this is:
If you attack, then lose, you will lose land.
If you attack, then lose, you will lose land.
March 28, 2025 at 9:37 PM
If you say the Nakba in 1948, then there’s no point talking to you as you leave out very vital context. But the biggest premise of this is:
If you attack, then lose, you will lose land.
If you attack, then lose, you will lose land.
It’s not the GOV, it’s the Arab locals. And it’s it because they DESERVE to live there. They literally BOUGHT the land that was available. There were very few that said the other’s generational ties don’t count until they started attacking.
March 28, 2025 at 9:35 PM
It’s not the GOV, it’s the Arab locals. And it’s it because they DESERVE to live there. They literally BOUGHT the land that was available. There were very few that said the other’s generational ties don’t count until they started attacking.
Quite the opposite really. And you can’t call it ethnic cleansing if they were attacked. Not to mention that those who didn’t flee or were displaced became citizen.
What you’re describing is more like the Crusade.
What you’re describing is more like the Crusade.
March 28, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Quite the opposite really. And you can’t call it ethnic cleansing if they were attacked. Not to mention that those who didn’t flee or were displaced became citizen.
What you’re describing is more like the Crusade.
What you’re describing is more like the Crusade.
You can claim ownership if you’re buying from a native landlord. That’s literally how it works anywhere. This isn’t unique to Palestine.
March 28, 2025 at 9:29 PM
You can claim ownership if you’re buying from a native landlord. That’s literally how it works anywhere. This isn’t unique to Palestine.
Despite the diaspora, they have ties to the land no matter how you look at it. Especially if the Jews living on that land wish for the others to return one day.
It could’ve been done peacefully. But Jews living in Palestine already had no peace. So the incoming ones would not be too well received.
It could’ve been done peacefully. But Jews living in Palestine already had no peace. So the incoming ones would not be too well received.
March 28, 2025 at 2:48 PM
Despite the diaspora, they have ties to the land no matter how you look at it. Especially if the Jews living on that land wish for the others to return one day.
It could’ve been done peacefully. But Jews living in Palestine already had no peace. So the incoming ones would not be too well received.
It could’ve been done peacefully. But Jews living in Palestine already had no peace. So the incoming ones would not be too well received.
Zionism’s basis is to create a state for an ethno-religious group in the place they call home in every prayer. I’m sure some believed it should be entirely for them, kicking out the rest.
But they arrived and bought land. Not very good one, either. Joining their native peers in the land.
But they arrived and bought land. Not very good one, either. Joining their native peers in the land.
March 28, 2025 at 2:48 PM
Zionism’s basis is to create a state for an ethno-religious group in the place they call home in every prayer. I’m sure some believed it should be entirely for them, kicking out the rest.
But they arrived and bought land. Not very good one, either. Joining their native peers in the land.
But they arrived and bought land. Not very good one, either. Joining their native peers in the land.
Animals. No, beasts.
Calling them animals would be an insult to animals.
Calling them animals would be an insult to animals.
March 28, 2025 at 6:54 AM
Animals. No, beasts.
Calling them animals would be an insult to animals.
Calling them animals would be an insult to animals.
You make zero sense. How were they able to elect in the first place? Could it be because Israel disengaged entirely in 2005 and gave Gaza its own sovereignty?
Then in 2007, when terror came from Gaza, both Egypt and Israel raised security borders, blocking movement.
Then in 2007, when terror came from Gaza, both Egypt and Israel raised security borders, blocking movement.
March 28, 2025 at 6:53 AM
You make zero sense. How were they able to elect in the first place? Could it be because Israel disengaged entirely in 2005 and gave Gaza its own sovereignty?
Then in 2007, when terror came from Gaza, both Egypt and Israel raised security borders, blocking movement.
Then in 2007, when terror came from Gaza, both Egypt and Israel raised security borders, blocking movement.