Oh I gotcha. Far too few reviewers understand mixed methods. I believe in the peer review process and that the work is stronger with collective input- just wish more reviewers were qual or MM ❤️

I’ve got an admin at a lab school starting a gifted program (100 students total)- would this be a good listen for a general understanding of the test?

My grandma was a librarian! Long live libraries!! ❤️❤️

I do both- because I much rather read physical books than ebooks :) but sometimes the ebook is faster!

Oh but sometimes it is, which people also don’t understand… R1, 2, & 3: “Why do you have a section on mixed method results, it should be combined?” Well, when I described (& cited) a convergent MM design, that means I analyze the data separately then see how it con/diverges: new section.

This was amazeballs. Bummed she didn’t get to say a few words but I love that they showed the video ❤️❤️

Nvm, read the thread and it was answered :)

Q: Do ebook check outs impact metrics in the same ways?

I understand none of this but snaps for self care!