Also, I have no idea what you mean by a 5 male panel. There is literally no panel at this event that I am aware of.

Not that it should matter what their identity is.. but the person behind this report & who gave up their Cambridge science career to drive change, & who led as lead author this v ambitious & high risk report, & who organised the event + chose speakers , & will lead this program forward is.. a woman.

Correct

Did you check who the program director, primary + lead author, and event organiser is for this event + report?

I expect your refusal to be on the panels improved all of them. Good on you!

Screenshotted this one for later......

I have never seen Alina behave unreasonably. She has been a portrait of courage and dignity in the face of arguably the worst fraud in the history of science. And through her courage and dignity, the argument has been won and the cover up exposed. Now comes accountability.

Well, I’ve seen a large saved archive of someone’s entire tweets that paints a different picture of how some senior virologists treated people who raised concerns. But you do you.

I think you should be learning that corrupting science by covering up how a pandemic started, bullying publicly people who were raising concerns, and blocking vital oversight of such research by doing so, has predictably negative consequences.