Andy Curtis
@andykar2.bsky.social
Socialist, love cricket, theatre and food.
I can't stand her. She's a Tory masquerading as Labour.
But this? It's nonsense.
But this? It's nonsense.
December 3, 2025 at 1:38 PM
I can't stand her. She's a Tory masquerading as Labour.
But this? It's nonsense.
But this? It's nonsense.
It's NOT a fall in immigration. It's a fall in NET immigration.
It's still going up, just not as fast. Maybe that's why it wasn't headline news.
It's still going up, just not as fast. Maybe that's why it wasn't headline news.
November 28, 2025 at 9:15 AM
It's NOT a fall in immigration. It's a fall in NET immigration.
It's still going up, just not as fast. Maybe that's why it wasn't headline news.
It's still going up, just not as fast. Maybe that's why it wasn't headline news.
Because most people will not understand the difference between net migration and immigration.
They will assume the question is talking about immigration and answer accordingly. And if that was the question, they would be right.
They will assume the question is talking about immigration and answer accordingly. And if that was the question, they would be right.
November 27, 2025 at 9:36 AM
Because most people will not understand the difference between net migration and immigration.
They will assume the question is talking about immigration and answer accordingly. And if that was the question, they would be right.
They will assume the question is talking about immigration and answer accordingly. And if that was the question, they would be right.
They will support anything that divides us. The more we fight over things, the more they can strip away our rights.
November 23, 2025 at 8:28 AM
They will support anything that divides us. The more we fight over things, the more they can strip away our rights.
Characters who make a date but don't actually discuss where and when.
November 22, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Characters who make a date but don't actually discuss where and when.
Partly that Labour have spent too much time focussing on what the RW media are saying.
Trying to appease them was never going to work.
Trying to appease them was never going to work.
November 20, 2025 at 11:20 AM
Partly that Labour have spent too much time focussing on what the RW media are saying.
Trying to appease them was never going to work.
Trying to appease them was never going to work.
I want him in front of a jury.
The rest of the stuff, don't care, since it will have zero effect on him.
The rest of the stuff, don't care, since it will have zero effect on him.
October 22, 2025 at 11:39 AM
I want him in front of a jury.
The rest of the stuff, don't care, since it will have zero effect on him.
The rest of the stuff, don't care, since it will have zero effect on him.
It's the disproportionate size of the fine - especially considering the lack of enforcement against the big polluters of our water.
A gentle warning would have been appropriate at most.
A gentle warning would have been appropriate at most.
October 22, 2025 at 10:51 AM
It's the disproportionate size of the fine - especially considering the lack of enforcement against the big polluters of our water.
A gentle warning would have been appropriate at most.
A gentle warning would have been appropriate at most.
It's about time Starmer actually started trying to do these things then.
October 21, 2025 at 9:08 AM
It's about time Starmer actually started trying to do these things then.
'Real' labour - you know the one with all of the Tory policies.
August 21, 2025 at 7:10 PM
'Real' labour - you know the one with all of the Tory policies.
Why on earth is he welcome?
He's been the Comical Ali of the Tories for years - regularly wheeled out to bulls**t on for the party at every cock up.
Every member of the public who knows who he is, knows he's a joke.
He's been the Comical Ali of the Tories for years - regularly wheeled out to bulls**t on for the party at every cock up.
Every member of the public who knows who he is, knows he's a joke.
July 24, 2025 at 10:25 PM
Why on earth is he welcome?
He's been the Comical Ali of the Tories for years - regularly wheeled out to bulls**t on for the party at every cock up.
Every member of the public who knows who he is, knows he's a joke.
He's been the Comical Ali of the Tories for years - regularly wheeled out to bulls**t on for the party at every cock up.
Every member of the public who knows who he is, knows he's a joke.
The nonsense spoken about his voting record continues.
Nearly every time he voted against Labour, it was when Labour sided with the Tories.
He almost never voted with the Tories against Labour.
Nearly every time he voted against Labour, it was when Labour sided with the Tories.
He almost never voted with the Tories against Labour.
July 24, 2025 at 10:15 PM
The nonsense spoken about his voting record continues.
Nearly every time he voted against Labour, it was when Labour sided with the Tories.
He almost never voted with the Tories against Labour.
Nearly every time he voted against Labour, it was when Labour sided with the Tories.
He almost never voted with the Tories against Labour.
The purpose of it is to drag the Overton window back to the left and give Socialists someone they can actually vote for.
July 24, 2025 at 10:08 PM
The purpose of it is to drag the Overton window back to the left and give Socialists someone they can actually vote for.
Starmer and his backstabbing friends did that.
July 24, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Starmer and his backstabbing friends did that.
Where did you get that from? There is no limited company set up for this new party.
The disinformation has started already.
The disinformation has started already.
July 24, 2025 at 10:02 PM
Where did you get that from? There is no limited company set up for this new party.
The disinformation has started already.
The disinformation has started already.
You mean because it’s currently being run through his Peace Project? Setting up a new party without the admin support of an existing group is nearly impossible. This will be the only party that's truly democratic—and you're worried about the privacy policy? Come on, get real.
July 24, 2025 at 9:56 PM
You mean because it’s currently being run through his Peace Project? Setting up a new party without the admin support of an existing group is nearly impossible. This will be the only party that's truly democratic—and you're worried about the privacy policy? Come on, get real.
Oh look, no answer, what a surprise.
July 17, 2025 at 4:44 PM
Oh look, no answer, what a surprise.
No, it's because the establishment has control of the Labour Party.
You think socialists are cranks? Heaven help this country with your friends in charge.
When Farage and his cronies win the next election, be proud of what you have achieved.
You think socialists are cranks? Heaven help this country with your friends in charge.
When Farage and his cronies win the next election, be proud of what you have achieved.
July 17, 2025 at 4:43 PM
No, it's because the establishment has control of the Labour Party.
You think socialists are cranks? Heaven help this country with your friends in charge.
When Farage and his cronies win the next election, be proud of what you have achieved.
You think socialists are cranks? Heaven help this country with your friends in charge.
When Farage and his cronies win the next election, be proud of what you have achieved.
And that's a tired old response to the argument.
Yes, of course, there is antisemitism on the left as well as the right. Was it weaponised against Corbyn? Yes, of course it was. Both can be true. But hardly anyone wants to admit it.
So why do you think they are quiet? What's your explanation?
Yes, of course, there is antisemitism on the left as well as the right. Was it weaponised against Corbyn? Yes, of course it was. Both can be true. But hardly anyone wants to admit it.
So why do you think they are quiet? What's your explanation?
July 17, 2025 at 10:20 AM
And that's a tired old response to the argument.
Yes, of course, there is antisemitism on the left as well as the right. Was it weaponised against Corbyn? Yes, of course it was. Both can be true. But hardly anyone wants to admit it.
So why do you think they are quiet? What's your explanation?
Yes, of course, there is antisemitism on the left as well as the right. Was it weaponised against Corbyn? Yes, of course it was. Both can be true. But hardly anyone wants to admit it.
So why do you think they are quiet? What's your explanation?
Funny how the outrage fades when the left isn’t a threat. The antisemitism claims were weaponised to undermine Corbyn. Diane Abbott doesn’t scare the establishment—so the usual voices go quiet.
July 17, 2025 at 10:04 AM
Funny how the outrage fades when the left isn’t a threat. The antisemitism claims were weaponised to undermine Corbyn. Diane Abbott doesn’t scare the establishment—so the usual voices go quiet.
Subtext? Sometimes it’s hard to tell if we’re uncovering what’s hidden in the writing or just echoing what we brought with us when we read it.
Sometimes we read between the lines—and sometimes we write between them ourselves.
Sometimes we read between the lines—and sometimes we write between them ourselves.
July 17, 2025 at 9:59 AM
Subtext? Sometimes it’s hard to tell if we’re uncovering what’s hidden in the writing or just echoing what we brought with us when we read it.
Sometimes we read between the lines—and sometimes we write between them ourselves.
Sometimes we read between the lines—and sometimes we write between them ourselves.
By that argument anyone who can't join the armed services (it varies but is mostly anyone in their 40s and over) shouldn't be allowed to vote?
They are all very different things and not at all comparable.
Make an honest argument.
They are all very different things and not at all comparable.
Make an honest argument.
July 17, 2025 at 9:51 AM
By that argument anyone who can't join the armed services (it varies but is mostly anyone in their 40s and over) shouldn't be allowed to vote?
They are all very different things and not at all comparable.
Make an honest argument.
They are all very different things and not at all comparable.
Make an honest argument.
Because she was forced out. You think this would happen if she wasn't suspended?
You know perfectly well this isn't the same circumstances, you're just using it to bash someone you don't like.
You know perfectly well this isn't the same circumstances, you're just using it to bash someone you don't like.
July 7, 2025 at 11:57 AM
Because she was forced out. You think this would happen if she wasn't suspended?
You know perfectly well this isn't the same circumstances, you're just using it to bash someone you don't like.
You know perfectly well this isn't the same circumstances, you're just using it to bash someone you don't like.
That's got to be trolling, he can't possibly believe that.
July 6, 2025 at 10:00 PM
That's got to be trolling, he can't possibly believe that.
" MPs who voluntarily change their party affiliation". As I stated she did not- nothing voluntary about it.
Read you own post, buddy.
Read you own post, buddy.
July 6, 2025 at 9:59 PM
" MPs who voluntarily change their party affiliation". As I stated she did not- nothing voluntary about it.
Read you own post, buddy.
Read you own post, buddy.