Andy Ball
@andychelsea99.bsky.social
Businessman, cycling advocate, opinionated.
(if we look at the small trucks, they burn only about 1//100km less than full sized, full sized are often discounted, and used they can be cheaper, add the extra space and ride comfort, the decision for the individual becomes a no baiter.
I had hopes for the Maverick , but it has priced itself out.
I had hopes for the Maverick , but it has priced itself out.
May 26, 2025 at 12:51 PM
(if we look at the small trucks, they burn only about 1//100km less than full sized, full sized are often discounted, and used they can be cheaper, add the extra space and ride comfort, the decision for the individual becomes a no baiter.
I had hopes for the Maverick , but it has priced itself out.
I had hopes for the Maverick , but it has priced itself out.
Interestingly my 4 cylinder rwd, 3 seater 1990s Nissan Pickup burned more fuel than my 5.0 V8 supercrew 6.5’ boxed 4x4 2016 F150.
While I agree it is too tall it is more efficient.
While I agree it is too tall it is more efficient.
May 26, 2025 at 2:04 AM
Interestingly my 4 cylinder rwd, 3 seater 1990s Nissan Pickup burned more fuel than my 5.0 V8 supercrew 6.5’ boxed 4x4 2016 F150.
While I agree it is too tall it is more efficient.
While I agree it is too tall it is more efficient.
There is a place for both types of bikes, depending on the goal and distance of the trip.
May 9, 2025 at 2:33 PM
There is a place for both types of bikes, depending on the goal and distance of the trip.
It seems to be their MO. Negative Bluster the day before, and then reasonable behind closed doors.
Lutnick, maybe be on to something, play for an audience of one, and then....
Lutnick, maybe be on to something, play for an audience of one, and then....
May 6, 2025 at 12:07 PM
It seems to be their MO. Negative Bluster the day before, and then reasonable behind closed doors.
Lutnick, maybe be on to something, play for an audience of one, and then....
Lutnick, maybe be on to something, play for an audience of one, and then....
China didn't give the bully wanted he wanted, looking for his next victim.
April 24, 2025 at 12:58 PM
China didn't give the bully wanted he wanted, looking for his next victim.
No, I’m a cyclist but…?
April 23, 2025 at 12:25 PM
No, I’m a cyclist but…?
He didn’t cave, he reduced. Just seen as a removal, but really a smaller implementation.
April 10, 2025 at 2:06 PM
He didn’t cave, he reduced. Just seen as a removal, but really a smaller implementation.
He still imposed 10% tariffs… and now they are generally seen as fine.
Before we gloat, who ultimately won?
Before we gloat, who ultimately won?
April 10, 2025 at 2:05 PM
He still imposed 10% tariffs… and now they are generally seen as fine.
Before we gloat, who ultimately won?
Before we gloat, who ultimately won?
and the benefits of trade.
April 8, 2025 at 1:11 PM
and the benefits of trade.
13 to 11 for context.
March 15, 2025 at 12:28 PM
13 to 11 for context.
Shifting the tax burden from the wealthy to the poor.
This disproportionately affects lower income people.
This disproportionately affects lower income people.
March 13, 2025 at 3:22 PM
Shifting the tax burden from the wealthy to the poor.
This disproportionately affects lower income people.
This disproportionately affects lower income people.
Dare we say, it may be iron-ic.
March 13, 2025 at 1:39 AM
Dare we say, it may be iron-ic.
We are wondering and waiting.
March 12, 2025 at 9:34 AM
We are wondering and waiting.
He doesn't seem stable.
March 12, 2025 at 3:39 AM
He doesn't seem stable.