Andrew V. Edwards
@andrewvedwards.bsky.social
Author of “Army of Liars” (2024) and “Digital is Destroying Everything” (2015, 2018), digital analytics pioneer, visual artist, builder of plastic models.
I’d say it’s fairly obvious. Now let’s talk about repopulating northern rust belt cities with same? Think India/Pakistan post independence.
January 23, 2025 at 9:31 PM
I’d say it’s fairly obvious. Now let’s talk about repopulating northern rust belt cities with same? Think India/Pakistan post independence.
For Mr. Cheet-o, the only important thing is that he gets to sign big fancy portfolio documents with a nice big pen while everyone watches. It could be his own death warrant, he would not know nor care.
January 23, 2025 at 9:23 PM
For Mr. Cheet-o, the only important thing is that he gets to sign big fancy portfolio documents with a nice big pen while everyone watches. It could be his own death warrant, he would not know nor care.
IMO bc she didn’t feel he was the threat she claimed he was. O/w how does she attend the inauguration? Not a good look. Hope she doesn’t try to run again.
January 23, 2025 at 9:15 PM
IMO bc she didn’t feel he was the threat she claimed he was. O/w how does she attend the inauguration? Not a good look. Hope she doesn’t try to run again.
I have not mentioned any conspiracy. I do ask if you know why WTC7 fell? It wasn’t hit by a plane and there was no jet fuel. It was also the NYC HQ of CIA and FBI. As for “methodology”? I was in and out of that building often and it was unusually robust.
January 23, 2025 at 9:10 PM
I have not mentioned any conspiracy. I do ask if you know why WTC7 fell? It wasn’t hit by a plane and there was no jet fuel. It was also the NYC HQ of CIA and FBI. As for “methodology”? I was in and out of that building often and it was unusually robust.
Me thinks you punish thyself by insisting on the best no matter the consequences (which often turn out to be the worst). Also not sure your “best” is ever going to be good enough.
January 23, 2025 at 9:05 PM
Me thinks you punish thyself by insisting on the best no matter the consequences (which often turn out to be the worst). Also not sure your “best” is ever going to be good enough.
WTC7 was not hit by a plane. There was no jet fuel. Please proceed with your exercise in Japanese poetry.
January 22, 2025 at 12:48 AM
WTC7 was not hit by a plane. There was no jet fuel. Please proceed with your exercise in Japanese poetry.
Agreed that voting is not about getting all you want. It’s largely about avoiding the worst. Which is a good life lesson regardless.
January 22, 2025 at 12:46 AM
Agreed that voting is not about getting all you want. It’s largely about avoiding the worst. Which is a good life lesson regardless.
Thanks for the update! I appreciate data. I’ll go out on a limb here and suggest that inferior building codes in Brazil may be partially to blame. But there’s no question you’re correct that other skyscrapers have collapsed. Urge you to look at the case of WTC7, an unusually robust edifice.
January 22, 2025 at 12:45 AM
Thanks for the update! I appreciate data. I’ll go out on a limb here and suggest that inferior building codes in Brazil may be partially to blame. But there’s no question you’re correct that other skyscrapers have collapsed. Urge you to look at the case of WTC7, an unusually robust edifice.
Such a bargain, kind Sir! We get seatbelts AND Bush AND Trump! Thanks for pointing me towards the light.
January 22, 2025 at 12:39 AM
Such a bargain, kind Sir! We get seatbelts AND Bush AND Trump! Thanks for pointing me towards the light.
I don’t. But that doesn’t mean you just hand it over to Elon just bc your precious little scruples.
January 22, 2025 at 12:34 AM
I don’t. But that doesn’t mean you just hand it over to Elon just bc your precious little scruples.
I’m sorry, what? You’re not even referencing Nader 2000. Can I say “Duh”, as you *attempt* to school me?
January 22, 2025 at 12:33 AM
I’m sorry, what? You’re not even referencing Nader 2000. Can I say “Duh”, as you *attempt* to school me?
Sorry to have offended thee. I don’t like Democrats either. But voting is deployed to keep out the worst, not to guarantee the best. Thank you.
January 22, 2025 at 12:32 AM
Sorry to have offended thee. I don’t like Democrats either. But voting is deployed to keep out the worst, not to guarantee the best. Thank you.
Correct. Nader, like Jill Stein, is/was an egotistical fool. And I have no words for people who threw away their votes on these ringers.
January 21, 2025 at 6:40 PM
Correct. Nader, like Jill Stein, is/was an egotistical fool. And I have no words for people who threw away their votes on these ringers.
Name one instance, globally, in all of history, where a fire collapsed a major steel building that wasn't literally on the property of the WTC. There have been many skyscraper fires. But I am sorry to report: zero building collapses. I am willing to be corrected.
January 21, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Name one instance, globally, in all of history, where a fire collapsed a major steel building that wasn't literally on the property of the WTC. There have been many skyscraper fires. But I am sorry to report: zero building collapses. I am willing to be corrected.
Dude who debunked it? Who are "people like me"? You know nothing about me, nor my personal experience with 9-11, nor my methodology. I am not saying I know any answers. I am saying there are significant unanswered questions, mainly about WTC7. Assuming you know what WTC7 is?
January 21, 2025 at 5:11 PM
Dude who debunked it? Who are "people like me"? You know nothing about me, nor my personal experience with 9-11, nor my methodology. I am not saying I know any answers. I am saying there are significant unanswered questions, mainly about WTC7. Assuming you know what WTC7 is?
I see you are now hoping for a gotcha moment. Which buildings, and what exactly are you trying to compare with WT7? Assuming you know what WT7 is.
January 21, 2025 at 1:21 AM
I see you are now hoping for a gotcha moment. Which buildings, and what exactly are you trying to compare with WT7? Assuming you know what WT7 is.
Odd! But here's my guess: the author got the rights back. And then got it published by another publisher with a different title.
January 20, 2025 at 9:33 PM
Odd! But here's my guess: the author got the rights back. And then got it published by another publisher with a different title.
There are too many anomalies. Why did every building at WTC get totally destroyed, yet no other buildings (as in zero) get totally destroyed? Both Deutschebank and 90 West burned out but did not collapse. Yet WT7, *not hit by a plane*, collapsed anyway? Why?
January 20, 2025 at 7:45 PM
There are too many anomalies. Why did every building at WTC get totally destroyed, yet no other buildings (as in zero) get totally destroyed? Both Deutschebank and 90 West burned out but did not collapse. Yet WT7, *not hit by a plane*, collapsed anyway? Why?
I can be wrong. But WT7 was not hit by a plane, so the "jet fuel fire" theory is moot. It burned and fell, unlike any other skyscraper, ever. Deutschebank, about same size and distance from towers, burned and stood. 90 West: same. WT7 is the Zapruder film of 9-11. Sorry to offend with facts.
January 20, 2025 at 7:40 PM
I can be wrong. But WT7 was not hit by a plane, so the "jet fuel fire" theory is moot. It burned and fell, unlike any other skyscraper, ever. Deutschebank, about same size and distance from towers, burned and stood. 90 West: same. WT7 is the Zapruder film of 9-11. Sorry to offend with facts.
We have touched a nerve, and here you are cursing on Bluesky. No need to be a structural engineer to note that WT7, a fifty-story steel tower, was not hit by an airplane but fell anyway. Meanwhile, Deutschebank, fifty stories but NOT part of the WTC, burned out and stood. Whose head is in the sand?
January 20, 2025 at 7:35 PM
We have touched a nerve, and here you are cursing on Bluesky. No need to be a structural engineer to note that WT7, a fifty-story steel tower, was not hit by an airplane but fell anyway. Meanwhile, Deutschebank, fifty stories but NOT part of the WTC, burned out and stood. Whose head is in the sand?
Thank you for not bothering to understand what I am talking about. WTC7 was not hit by any airplane. It burned and fell. Deutschebank, a fifty story tower, not part of WTC, burned out and stood. 90 West Street burned out and stood. Is that dumb?
January 20, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Thank you for not bothering to understand what I am talking about. WTC7 was not hit by any airplane. It burned and fell. Deutschebank, a fifty story tower, not part of WTC, burned out and stood. 90 West Street burned out and stood. Is that dumb?
With props for his legislative achievements, I disagree he deserves thanks. He ran an awful 2024 campaign, and then (even with immunity), turned over the keys to a person who is bent on the destruction of America. And Kamala on Jan 6 changed her name to Nevilla Chamberlain. Nope!
January 20, 2025 at 7:29 PM
With props for his legislative achievements, I disagree he deserves thanks. He ran an awful 2024 campaign, and then (even with immunity), turned over the keys to a person who is bent on the destruction of America. And Kamala on Jan 6 changed her name to Nevilla Chamberlain. Nope!
I posted this elsewhere, but on the topic of suppression of facts, please see the following:
open.substack.com/pub/andrewve...
open.substack.com/pub/andrewve...
The Book They Don't Want You to Read
How "Digital is Destroying Everything" Became a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
open.substack.com
January 20, 2025 at 7:23 PM
I posted this elsewhere, but on the topic of suppression of facts, please see the following:
open.substack.com/pub/andrewve...
open.substack.com/pub/andrewve...
This. I encourage buying old Brittanica or Americana encyclopedia sets. They can be had cheap. And they are gold mines of excellent info. Often they have better entries on major subjects than many books about same.
January 20, 2025 at 7:20 PM
This. I encourage buying old Brittanica or Americana encyclopedia sets. They can be had cheap. And they are gold mines of excellent info. Often they have better entries on major subjects than many books about same.