I think so, yuuup! I will say, too, that when we provide a nudge on national Hispanic growth, we see White fight sentiment generated in places with local growth (study 4). But it helps to add to the story here, as we note

Also another piece of mine on this www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

7) PS, if you're curious, reach out to me about post-2024 Election continuation of these analyses. I have a LOT to say, and have even validated the efficacy of White fight sentiment with more recent studies.

6) Check our sections on "Addressing Caveats and Drawbacks." We unpack quite a bit there.

5) Black growth on county levels at base drives up White fight sentiment through the prime. Crucially though, when the prime is paired with a discussion of Hispanic growth on a national level, we see upticks of White fight sentiment among White Americans in counties with Hispanic growth too.

4) Consideration of national racial demographic change, NOT state level, is what generates White fight sentiment. We identify this through a similarly worded prime on state-level changes relative to national-level changes.

3) We build off of Gordon Allport's Scale of Prejudice and Discrimination to define the concept.

2) Similar conditions that motivated flight now motivate fight:

1) Overall, we find that White Americans who live in counties with White American decline or Black American increase *specifically* become more violent and antidemocratic when they receive a simple prime about racial demographic change. We define this as "White fight sentiment."