Assortative reconfiguration.

Another one from this evening

From person who knows such things: According to Lamas (2004), the name Papilio pyrrha Cramer 1775 is preoccupied with Papilio pyrrha Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775, and therefore unavailable.

poor parents!

shark photo from Kris Mikael Krister via Wikipedia CC

Thanks for sharing! Possibly a lepidopteron, certainly not a butterfly. BTW, while all butterflies ARE moths, that doesn't mean that any possible moth can be referred to as a butterfly. But I suppose science.org carries a concealed poetic license.

Would it make it easier to explain the bilateral gynandromorphs and their survival? It always seemed incredibly lucky that they are a byproduct of double fertilization of a binucleate oocyte as if they grow on trees these "binucleate oocytes"... @evolvwing.bsky.social