At what point do we ignore the law to save the law?

Anyone have knowledge on if execution of an NDA, occurring after the date of the relevant activity, must be given effect or can it be nullified if such execution itself would could be a crime, such as obstruction of justice, fraud, accessory...

You're so right. That's the problem - the administration thinks it's acting lawfully. But laws can also be driven by social movements. And I think that's where we are. We are the movement

Seriously why is there no defense for us withholding federal taxes?? Normally yes it's a federal crime but we the people gave the authority to be taxed in return for representation and to be the beneficiary of such tax dollars. Not to actively fund corruption and illegal activities

We haven't, but we currently have a pressing matter of getting rid of a convicted felon and pedophile from the highest seat in the nation. See we will even need to convince 67 (six seeeven) senators to agree to override what will be trumps veto to releasing the Epstein files.

So...no one has shown Donny this?

Right! It was so bad it turned comedic. There was one email where a reporter asked him to use grammar so they could understand what he was saying.

Epstein also noted that which we've all been saying - we need one mass movement to stop this. This bits and pieces and playing a waiting game is going to do us all harm. If they release the files, dems need to make sure they're ready to act swiftly with the fallout for this to have any impact.

Agreed! This needs to be a constitutional amendment

Agreed. We've now witnessed the end of the Democratic Party. We need to back only those proven to act for the people and no ties to PAC or other corporate funding

Of course he is. And optically he isn't wrong. There was no reason to cave. It was treasonous betrayal after 40 days and the sweeping elections last week. There is no reason good enough for what occurred.
Heard (but didn't fact check) it was American Airline funding pressure