Certainly less than peers. There is way too much politics in peer review of manuscripts and grants

Excellent idea. I wish we could replace human reviewers (and their inherent biases) with AI some day soon. Be it in publishing or in grant evaluation.

Couldn't they have just used the free version ? Or Google offers its LLM for free up to a certain extent too.

Percentiles are smoothened over a 3 year rolling baseline for a given SRG, which is why a didn't dip in priority scores would affect it. At least for a while till it recovers (which is what you see in your graph)

Aren't study section terms typically for 4 years? It could well be that a small group reviewers got recruited around the same time. It's one vote, sure, but hypercritical, loud individuals often sway the vote for unassigned applications too. And all you need is a minor shift down ...

My condolences

Why beat around the bush and wax academic about it? The easiest explanation is that they ended up with a couple of asshole reviewers in the study section ! 😝

In the era of AI, this "out-of the-box" creativity can be trained very easily to "adventurous" trainees (and scientists).

You have shown very little courage after losing the election and left the Democrats leaderless All that bombastic talk is just hot air and fake advertising

We are in the middle of a 5-alarm fire with a potential existential risk to our research mission, and faculty politics is tied up in knots about being mandated to instal cybersecurity software ......!

28 articles. Seems like it is reading up peer reviewed published articles to learn.

Congratulations 🍾