M.C.S.E. Amer Awad
@amerawad111.bsky.social
Racism will prevent the article from spreading; it's a dangerous article that re-establishes the rules of grammar.
January 25, 2026 at 6:59 AM
Racism will prevent the article from spreading; it's a dangerous article that re-establishes the rules of grammar.
Did you have any problems with the sources, as some claim? Personally, I didn't find any issues with the sources.
January 24, 2026 at 10:00 PM
Did you have any problems with the sources, as some claim? Personally, I didn't find any issues with the sources.
I read the brilliant article; it requires a special kind of awareness. It seems the editors of Nature magazine changed their minds due to external pressures—we all know who those are.
January 24, 2026 at 6:44 PM
I read the brilliant article; it requires a special kind of awareness. It seems the editors of Nature magazine changed their minds due to external pressures—we all know who those are.
I read the brilliant article; it requires a special kind of awareness. It seems the editors of Nature magazine changed their minds due to external pressures—we all know who those are.
January 24, 2026 at 6:43 PM
I read the brilliant article; it requires a special kind of awareness. It seems the editors of Nature magazine changed their minds due to external pressures—we all know who those are.
Fake accounts? Says the guy with 300 followers on a ghost app! How does a micro-account override Nature's 7-month review? Do you own the journal or manipulate it from behind the walls? By the way, did you buy those 300 followers?
January 24, 2026 at 6:25 PM
Fake accounts? Says the guy with 300 followers on a ghost app! How does a micro-account override Nature's 7-month review? Do you own the journal or manipulate it from behind the walls? By the way, did you buy those 300 followers?
Reposted by M.C.S.E. Amer Awad
The resistance scholars faced was not rooted in empirical failure, but in the threat their ideas posed to established power structures, dominant paradigms, and institutional authority.
January 24, 2026 at 9:59 AM
The resistance scholars faced was not rooted in empirical failure, but in the threat their ideas posed to established power structures, dominant paradigms, and institutional authority.
Reposted by M.C.S.E. Amer Awad
Galileo Galilei, Giordano Bruno, Ignaz Semmelweis, Alfred Wegener, Nikola Tesla, Rosalind Franklin, and Lise Meitner were dismissed or suppressed not for error, but for challenging power, consensus, and authority a recurring structural response to disruptive ideas.
January 24, 2026 at 9:57 AM
Galileo Galilei, Giordano Bruno, Ignaz Semmelweis, Alfred Wegener, Nikola Tesla, Rosalind Franklin, and Lise Meitner were dismissed or suppressed not for error, but for challenging power, consensus, and authority a recurring structural response to disruptive ideas.
Reposted by M.C.S.E. Amer Awad
Do you think that your response is logical? You are referring to Nature's reviewers and editorial board as shoddy workers and low-level scientists. The last time I checked, the article satisfies all the conditions to be a Nature's article.
January 23, 2026 at 11:08 PM
Do you think that your response is logical? You are referring to Nature's reviewers and editorial board as shoddy workers and low-level scientists. The last time I checked, the article satisfies all the conditions to be a Nature's article.
It appears the philological complexity of the paper exceeded the processing limits of your rigid cognitive paradigm, forcing you to resort to ad hominem fallacies. Perhaps a return to Linguistics 101 is in order to learn the distinction between 'critique' and 'tantrum'.
January 24, 2026 at 10:00 AM
It appears the philological complexity of the paper exceeded the processing limits of your rigid cognitive paradigm, forcing you to resort to ad hominem fallacies. Perhaps a return to Linguistics 101 is in order to learn the distinction between 'critique' and 'tantrum'.
Have you actually engaged with the hermeneutics in the paper? It's brilliant. The 'AI' accusation falls flat when you realize this text was written in 2020. Don't let tools replace critical thinking. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
RETRACTED ARTICLE: A cross-linguistic investigation of /h/ symbolism: the case of H2O - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications - RETRACTED ARTICLE: A cross-linguistic investigation of /h/ symbolism: the case of H2O
www.nature.com
January 24, 2026 at 12:57 AM
Have you actually engaged with the hermeneutics in the paper? It's brilliant. The 'AI' accusation falls flat when you realize this text was written in 2020. Don't let tools replace critical thinking. www.nature.com/articles/s41...