D3ad 3yeliner
@amelia0506.bsky.social
She/Her, Gamer, British Veteran, Left Wing Lover, Ink Addicted, Freedom and Justice for all. No war except class war.
MAGA are Nazis. Humans do not tolerate Nazis.
Slava Ukraini
MAGA are Nazis. Humans do not tolerate Nazis.
Slava Ukraini
Reposted by D3ad 3yeliner
The Online Safety Act is fascism.
August 3, 2025 at 1:55 PM
The Online Safety Act is fascism.
Here we go, this is how it starts.
Barclays will now ban trans women from using female bathrooms.
archive.is/202504301456...
Barclays will now ban trans women from using female bathrooms.
archive.is/202504301456...
archive.is
May 1, 2025 at 5:33 AM
Here we go, this is how it starts.
Barclays will now ban trans women from using female bathrooms.
archive.is/202504301456...
Barclays will now ban trans women from using female bathrooms.
archive.is/202504301456...
Reposted by D3ad 3yeliner
This ruling must not stand. Please join me in supporting Good Law Project's challenge.
🏳️⚧️ NEW 🏳️⚧️
We believe the Supreme Court – which disgracefully refused to hear from trans people before its decision last week – has placed the UK in breach of its obligations under the Human Rights Act.
So we’re readying a challenge – join us:
goodlaw.social/xpme
We believe the Supreme Court – which disgracefully refused to hear from trans people before its decision last week – has placed the UK in breach of its obligations under the Human Rights Act.
So we’re readying a challenge – join us:
goodlaw.social/xpme
Help us challenge the Supreme Court’s judgment on trans rights | Good Law Project
goodlaw.social
April 25, 2025 at 9:34 PM
This ruling must not stand. Please join me in supporting Good Law Project's challenge.
www.itv.com
April 27, 2025 at 9:25 AM
Well fuck me. No public toilets for trans people to use in the UK. Guess I'll just piss myself in public then.
www.equalityhumanrights.com/media-centre...
www.equalityhumanrights.com/media-centre...
An interim update on the practical implications of the UK Supreme Court judgment | EHRC
www.equalityhumanrights.com
April 26, 2025 at 9:30 AM
Well fuck me. No public toilets for trans people to use in the UK. Guess I'll just piss myself in public then.
www.equalityhumanrights.com/media-centre...
www.equalityhumanrights.com/media-centre...
Reposted by D3ad 3yeliner
This is Gender Critical. Please watch. It’s invariably privileged middle-class white women. Mean Girl bullying. Imagine this through the prism of race.
April 25, 2025 at 11:13 AM
This is Gender Critical. Please watch. It’s invariably privileged middle-class white women. Mean Girl bullying. Imagine this through the prism of race.
I've just asked to join a men only mental health group in my city. Here we go =)
April 25, 2025 at 12:38 PM
I've just asked to join a men only mental health group in my city. Here we go =)
I really hope this goes to the European courts. Because I'm sure Labour have breached the human rights of trans people. But I'm not a solicitor, but this whole thing stinks to high heaven.
April 22, 2025 at 10:57 PM
I really hope this goes to the European courts. Because I'm sure Labour have breached the human rights of trans people. But I'm not a solicitor, but this whole thing stinks to high heaven.
I'm starting to think Starmer was fine with this decision, because Trump is demanding the removal of LGBT rights in exchange for a trade deal, and Starmer is on his knees with Trumps mushroom in his mouth guzzling down his jizz.
April 22, 2025 at 10:46 PM
I'm starting to think Starmer was fine with this decision, because Trump is demanding the removal of LGBT rights in exchange for a trade deal, and Starmer is on his knees with Trumps mushroom in his mouth guzzling down his jizz.
To erase a minority from society is genocide. To not provide services to trans people, but provide them to cis people is an erasure. This was the plan all the long, to force us to live indoors, to take away our ability to be in public.
April 22, 2025 at 10:45 PM
To erase a minority from society is genocide. To not provide services to trans people, but provide them to cis people is an erasure. This was the plan all the long, to force us to live indoors, to take away our ability to be in public.
Mt prediction on Starmer's response to the Supreme Court:
He welcomes the judgement.He will say that he always supported biological sex based spaces, trans people must have protections, the word woman MUST mean biological sex. Trans people are NOT their biological sex etc etc.
Total cunt.
He welcomes the judgement.He will say that he always supported biological sex based spaces, trans people must have protections, the word woman MUST mean biological sex. Trans people are NOT their biological sex etc etc.
Total cunt.
April 22, 2025 at 11:00 AM
Mt prediction on Starmer's response to the Supreme Court:
He welcomes the judgement.He will say that he always supported biological sex based spaces, trans people must have protections, the word woman MUST mean biological sex. Trans people are NOT their biological sex etc etc.
Total cunt.
He welcomes the judgement.He will say that he always supported biological sex based spaces, trans people must have protections, the word woman MUST mean biological sex. Trans people are NOT their biological sex etc etc.
Total cunt.
Right wing troll currently talking bullshit about how trans women lost and GRC is no longer valid. (praphrased)
April 19, 2025 at 9:31 AM
Right wing troll currently talking bullshit about how trans women lost and GRC is no longer valid. (praphrased)
Reposted by D3ad 3yeliner
You seem to have jumped on the ignorance band wagon, Joan. I know that's what bigots like to do but here's a chance to learn about the reality of the situation.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
The supreme court didn’t rule on the definition of ‘a woman’ – this is what its judgment does mean | Sam Fowles
The judges had to interpret the law as set down by parliament. But it must be remembered this is not an abstract debate; it concerns real people, says barrister Sam Fowles
www.theguardian.com
April 17, 2025 at 9:33 PM
You seem to have jumped on the ignorance band wagon, Joan. I know that's what bigots like to do but here's a chance to learn about the reality of the situation.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
Reposted by D3ad 3yeliner
1/ BREAKING: So - it turns out deeply-religious Lord Hodge, the Judge in yesterday’s UK Supreme Court Case that destroyed trans rights, headed a ‘Commission On Same-Sex Relationships’ for the Church of Scotland published in 2011.
April 17, 2025 at 12:52 PM
1/ BREAKING: So - it turns out deeply-religious Lord Hodge, the Judge in yesterday’s UK Supreme Court Case that destroyed trans rights, headed a ‘Commission On Same-Sex Relationships’ for the Church of Scotland published in 2011.
10
What to Do Next:
Apply for a GRC if you don’t have one yet. If you’re eligible and meet the requirements (typically living as a woman for at least two years, providing evidence of gender dysphoria, etc.), this will give you clear legal recognition as a woman in most contexts.
What to Do Next:
Apply for a GRC if you don’t have one yet. If you’re eligible and meet the requirements (typically living as a woman for at least two years, providing evidence of gender dysphoria, etc.), this will give you clear legal recognition as a woman in most contexts.
April 17, 2025 at 9:16 PM
10
What to Do Next:
Apply for a GRC if you don’t have one yet. If you’re eligible and meet the requirements (typically living as a woman for at least two years, providing evidence of gender dysphoria, etc.), this will give you clear legal recognition as a woman in most contexts.
What to Do Next:
Apply for a GRC if you don’t have one yet. If you’re eligible and meet the requirements (typically living as a woman for at least two years, providing evidence of gender dysphoria, etc.), this will give you clear legal recognition as a woman in most contexts.
9
Private vs. Public Spaces: Depending on the specific organization, you may encounter resistance in some private sector spaces (like certain companies or sports), especially if they decide to enforce rules based on biological sex or the ruling. But your GRC would still offer legal protection.
Private vs. Public Spaces: Depending on the specific organization, you may encounter resistance in some private sector spaces (like certain companies or sports), especially if they decide to enforce rules based on biological sex or the ruling. But your GRC would still offer legal protection.
April 17, 2025 at 9:15 PM
9
Private vs. Public Spaces: Depending on the specific organization, you may encounter resistance in some private sector spaces (like certain companies or sports), especially if they decide to enforce rules based on biological sex or the ruling. But your GRC would still offer legal protection.
Private vs. Public Spaces: Depending on the specific organization, you may encounter resistance in some private sector spaces (like certain companies or sports), especially if they decide to enforce rules based on biological sex or the ruling. But your GRC would still offer legal protection.
8
However, legally, your GRC should still protect your rights in most instances.
However, legally, your GRC should still protect your rights in most instances.
April 17, 2025 at 9:14 PM
8
However, legally, your GRC should still protect your rights in most instances.
However, legally, your GRC should still protect your rights in most instances.
7
Gender-specific spaces and services (like certain healthcare, prisons, or sports) might become more complicated because the ruling suggests that the definition of "woman" may not be inclusive of trans women in certain settings unless specifically outlined by law or policy.
Gender-specific spaces and services (like certain healthcare, prisons, or sports) might become more complicated because the ruling suggests that the definition of "woman" may not be inclusive of trans women in certain settings unless specifically outlined by law or policy.
April 17, 2025 at 9:14 PM
7
Gender-specific spaces and services (like certain healthcare, prisons, or sports) might become more complicated because the ruling suggests that the definition of "woman" may not be inclusive of trans women in certain settings unless specifically outlined by law or policy.
Gender-specific spaces and services (like certain healthcare, prisons, or sports) might become more complicated because the ruling suggests that the definition of "woman" may not be inclusive of trans women in certain settings unless specifically outlined by law or policy.
6
Complications from the Ruling:
The ruling makes it clear that legal gender identity is tied to sex-based rights, meaning that trans women with a GRC are legally women, but the ruling creates confusion around the interpretation of sex and gender in broader societal contexts.
Complications from the Ruling:
The ruling makes it clear that legal gender identity is tied to sex-based rights, meaning that trans women with a GRC are legally women, but the ruling creates confusion around the interpretation of sex and gender in broader societal contexts.
April 17, 2025 at 9:13 PM
6
Complications from the Ruling:
The ruling makes it clear that legal gender identity is tied to sex-based rights, meaning that trans women with a GRC are legally women, but the ruling creates confusion around the interpretation of sex and gender in broader societal contexts.
Complications from the Ruling:
The ruling makes it clear that legal gender identity is tied to sex-based rights, meaning that trans women with a GRC are legally women, but the ruling creates confusion around the interpretation of sex and gender in broader societal contexts.
5
Access to Services:
Access to female services (like women’s healthcare or services for women in public spaces) should remain unaffected if you have a GRC. The ruling may have introduced new legal challenges, but having a GRC still establishes your legal right to access women’s spaces.
Access to Services:
Access to female services (like women’s healthcare or services for women in public spaces) should remain unaffected if you have a GRC. The ruling may have introduced new legal challenges, but having a GRC still establishes your legal right to access women’s spaces.
April 17, 2025 at 9:13 PM
5
Access to Services:
Access to female services (like women’s healthcare or services for women in public spaces) should remain unaffected if you have a GRC. The ruling may have introduced new legal challenges, but having a GRC still establishes your legal right to access women’s spaces.
Access to Services:
Access to female services (like women’s healthcare or services for women in public spaces) should remain unaffected if you have a GRC. The ruling may have introduced new legal challenges, but having a GRC still establishes your legal right to access women’s spaces.