Amber Cowans (she/her)
banner
ambercowans.bsky.social
Amber Cowans (she/her)
@ambercowans.bsky.social
PhD researcher at University of St Andrews 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Using remote sensing and AI to study the effects of human recreation on ecological communities 🦊🦡🪶🐦‍⬛

(recreation ecology, statistical ecology, human-wildlife interaction, bioacoustics, camera traps, AI)
Hi Alex, I'm working with Strava metro to look at recreational effects on wildlife in the Cairngorms! Happy to chat more
September 9, 2025 at 3:59 PM
🚨 So "How many sites do I need"? The answer = it depends on inference objective! We provide recommended minimum sample sizes for different contexts based on our simulation outputs here ⬇️ P.s. all our code is freely available on OSF, so have a play around!
August 8, 2025 at 10:12 AM
Take home 4: In all scenarios, far fewer sites were needed to estimate the conditional and marginal occupancy probabilities (i.e. prediction), compared to the exact interaction term (i.e. inference)
August 8, 2025 at 10:12 AM
Take home 3: Adding covariates to the model also upped the sample sizes needed to estimate interaction terms without bias 💻🌲
August 8, 2025 at 10:12 AM
Take home 2: Adding more species to the models reduced the power to detect interactions of a similar strength. For example, a null model with 5 species needed 400 sites compared to 250 sites with 3 species
August 8, 2025 at 10:12 AM
Take home 1: Under the simplest model structure, we needed around 200 sites to detect and estimate strong interactions without bias. These requirements increased when (1) detection probability was lower and (2) species interactions were weaker
August 8, 2025 at 10:12 AM
We did an extensive simulation study to show how well the Rota et al multispecies occupancy model estimates interaction terms under different detection probabilities, interaction strengths, interaction directions (positive/negative) and model structures, from 20 to ~3000 sites
August 8, 2025 at 10:12 AM