You are correct, but again I feel as if using extremist is just a bit of a stretch.

WRONG!

The HTS are definitely religious but cannot be considered “extremist”, and they completely severed all of their ties with Al-Qaeda in 2016 and even helped bring them down when they attempted an expansion. There are also other rebel faction participating and the SNA might join soon.

It is. Well it’s rather New Aleppo or Al-Hamadinya. But most likely New Aleppo.

Oh it’s bad for Russia alright lmaoo

They have 15,000 members but at they are an insurgency and looking at how well things have been going so far, I can tell that they’re a damn good insurgency. If the Syrian National Army chooses to join (which seems very likely) then the rebels will most likely hold out and reach Aleppo.

Assadists claim that the main group of rebels, the HTS are apart of AQ, but they in fact unaligned with AQ back in 2016 and participated in fighting AQ terrorists and stopping AQ expansion.

I suggest you block this guy. We don’t want this place turning into twitter.

Hamas says he’s alive, if he wasn’t there would be no reason to appoint military chief. And again, we have no reason to believe the IDF more than Hamas. They’re the same mfs who claimed Hamas’s main military outpost was under Al-Shifa ffs.

www.middleeasteye.net/news/mohamme...

There is no proof of his killing other than Israel’s word and after 13 months of genocide I think it’s safe to assume Israel’s word isn’t believable.
Hamas on the other have claimed that’s he’s still alive and a picture has surfaced of him alive after his death.
He’s most likely alive.

I feel like we should hate those who spread hate speech and insight violence.

I guess you could say that they made an agreement with Hezbollah.

Hezbollah stays in the south and protects Lebanon’s border from Israel, the government allows weapons shipments to come in from Syria, and the army is there to keep things stable and stop any takeovers.

Is it kinda pathetic? Yeah.

Look man, I get your frustrations, but like I said; it was rather get funding and buy weapons from the US and some allies or don’t get funded and don’t buy weapons at all.

If they rejected the deal it would’ve left them weak & Hezbollah un-challenged, which is not something the government wanted.

That’s just the choice they had in 2006. America was going to sanction them but they also gave them a funding deal. In which the army kinda had to take. But because the funding was very limited(only $3B in 18 years), it kept the army weak, which gave even more rise to Hezbollah. It’s disappointing.

The Lebanese army is not funded by Israel, and it never has been. But the issue when it comes to the Lebanese army’s funding is that it technically has military contracts with the US while simultaneously being sanctioned by the US. Meaning they can only buy US weapons which are too expensive.

It’d be hell of a way to fully transition onto Bluesky.

Noooooo

Half the reason we left Twitter is because of people like you. Go back and stay there with all the conservatives you pretend to not share opinions with.