Alun Parsons
banner
alun-owen.bsky.social
Alun Parsons
@alun-owen.bsky.social
Welsh bloke living in Finland. Molecular biology technician at the Institute of Molecular Biology, Helsinki University. Interested in politics, economically very left wing. Not a populist.
We have known what he is like since 2015. And yet the numbers who vote for him have increased at every election. People clearly want an incompetent, vain, bigoted ignoramus in the White House. What does that say about voters?
November 27, 2025 at 3:45 AM
How are you any different? You literally went to help Putin's genocide in Ukraine, and leave NATO. You seem to enjoy a fascist as much as Farage does.
November 4, 2025 at 12:05 PM
Reposted by Alun Parsons
Hahahahha
November 3, 2025 at 10:26 AM
And yet you won't promise to reverse it. The reasons you gave for not having a policy to rejoin the EU were pathetic and unconvincing. You're no friend to those us who want to rejoin.
November 3, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Excellent piece! I am sceptical that changing leader is sensible. But Starmer is so incompetent! Can he even find an effective director of communications or chief of staff? If I could replace him, I'd go for Miliband. He was Labour's best leader while in opposition. I think he'd be ace.
October 31, 2025 at 11:27 AM
You're not wrong, I am here in Finland (though I am British), and we have the proto-fascists in government!
October 29, 2025 at 9:50 AM
Won't hear an argument from me. When Powell gave his Rivers of Blood Speech the entire political establishment condemned him. Meanwhile Labour are pandering to Reform on the issue of refugees. The Tories are Reform *are* worse though. They are talking about deporting legal immigrants.
October 29, 2025 at 4:58 AM
In the podcast @bwalker.uk argues that Plaid won't benefit from tactical voting in the next Senedd general election. Why does he think that? By my reckoning if Caerffili had been d'Hondt it would be 3 to Reform, and 3 to Plaid. But if 3,000 Lab voters switched to Plaid, it would be 4-2 to Plaid.
October 27, 2025 at 5:56 AM
By my reckoning, if the Caerffili result had been a d'Hondt election Plaid and Reform would each win 3 seats. *But* if 3,000 of the Labour voters had tactically switched to Plaid, then Plaid would win 4 seats and Reform 2 seats. Food for thought.
October 27, 2025 at 5:51 AM
I am talking about the Polanski. He has ways said he is a populist. Populists like fascists, that is a given. Polanski has said he want to abandon Ukraine to Putin's genocide. He has said he wants to leave NATO. The guy is clearly an idiot.
October 25, 2025 at 8:11 AM
Greens want to abandon Ukraine. That is tantamount to supporting fascism in Russia. Leaving NATO is a cretinous policy. Not a serious party.
October 24, 2025 at 11:24 AM
Labour's campaign was all negative, it was atrociously bad. They're doomed next spring unless they find a positive issue to campaign on. With the new list system, and full PR, the zero-sum game of FPTP simply won't work.
October 24, 2025 at 11:17 AM
They're both populists who love a fascist dictator.
October 23, 2025 at 12:23 PM
She's angry because people treated her with respect, despite disagreeing with her politics.
October 20, 2025 at 5:13 PM
You are merely displaying your misogyny. If you're arguing that Trump was preferable, then you're just proving my point. *No* woman would be good enough for you "brother", because you'll always find the excuse to choose the much, much worse man. Thanks for proving me right.
proving.mt
October 20, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Your misogyny is rank.
October 20, 2025 at 4:15 AM
And misogynists. The two times Trump wpn he faced a woman. Those two women were both ten times the person he is. More intelligent, more experienced, better in every conceivable way. But Americans preferred an insane man. Sexism writ large.
October 20, 2025 at 2:52 AM
Reposted by Alun Parsons
October 20, 2025 at 2:26 AM