Allie
LightNews LightNews
allieowl.neocities.org
Allie
@allieowl.neocities.org
15 followers 27 following 2 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
allieowl.neocities.org
buridan's cart
pandez.bsky.social Pandez GOH MCFC2026 @pandez.bsky.social · Jul 1
😵‍💫🧐💩
July 1, 2025 at 5:15 AM
allieowl.neocities.org
draw your fursona wearing nothing but this
It is quite true that, in giving an ostensive definition for instance, we often point to the object named and say the name. And similarly, in giving an ostensive definition for instance, we say the word “this” while pointing to a thing. And also the word “this” and a name often occupy the same position in a sentence. But it is precisely characteristic of a name that it is defined by means of the demonstrative expression “That is N” (or “That is called ‘N’ ”). But do we also give the definitions: “That is called ‘this’ ”, or “This is called ‘this’ ”? This is connected with the conception of naming as, so to speak, an occult process. Naming appears as a queer connexion of a word with an object.—And you really get such a queer connexion when the philosopher tries to bring out the relation between name and thing by staring at an object in front of him and repeating a name or even the word “this” innumerable times. For philosophical problems arise when language goes on holiday. And here we may indeed fancy naming to be some remarkable act of mind, as it were a baptism of an object. And we can also say the word “this” to the object, as it were address the object as “this”—a queer use of this word, which doubtless only occurs in doing philosophy.
May 16, 2025 at 2:14 AM