When someone else reaps the benefits of your work, it is an act of war. Especially when these bad actors decimate the work you produced in principle, reap the output(s) for themselves. There is no point in whining, you brace yourself for war and win. This is the only way.

"You teach yourself the law, I train your minds. You come in here with a skull full of mush, and if you survive, you'll leave thinking like a lawyer."

Do you really need a professor to tell you how to remove those mushes from your skull?

youtu.be/yQLW7v3s7KQ?...

Magical place

All things referential are meant to be just a reference. To be absolutely free from someone else’s bias to intrude upon yours, you need scrap through multiple references to form your own inference.

Carl Jung is way more interesting than Freud. But Alfred Adler remains the most appealing to me.

How can AI make reading more enjoyable? What would an AI-powered reading experience look like? Over the holidays, I prototyped aireadingclub.com to explore ideas like:

• Context understanding
• Creating quizzes
• Recap the book so far
• Look up & summarize a term

OK If we are moving to Bluesky I am rescuing my favourite ever twitter thread (Jan 2019).

The renamed:

Bluesky-sized history of neuroscience (biased by my interests)

Edinburgh quite literally is the prettiest city I’ve been to.

#Scotland