But Hamas' leaders clearly knew how the IDF as a predictable system would respond to an attack on a large number of Israeli civilians. Thus, what then happened, was obviously intended by Hamas.
‼️ That‘s an explanation of an expectable system response, not a justification!
But Hamas' leaders clearly knew how the IDF as a predictable system would respond to an attack on a large number of Israeli civilians. Thus, what then happened, was obviously intended by Hamas.
‼️ That‘s an explanation of an expectable system response, not a justification!
But Hamas' leaders clearly knew how the IDF as a predictable system would respond to an attack on a large number of Israeli civilians. Thus, what then happened, was obviously intended by Hamas.
‼️ That‘s an explanation of an expectable system response, not a justification!
I think that terrorists should neither use nor injure nor kill civilians.
I think that terrorists should neither use nor injure nor kill civilians.
I interpret your answer to that question as “No, that is not sufficient evidence.” I agree to that.
I interpret your answer to that question as “No, that is not sufficient evidence.” I agree to that.
A reminds B of what Hamas did on October 7th in Israel. Is that sufficient evidence that A supports genocide?
A reminds B of what Hamas did on October 7th in Israel. Is that sufficient evidence that A supports genocide?