I feel like we should be veeeery concerned with the what providing anonymized admissions data to ensure compliance with not considering race implies.

Finally somebody else said it! 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

This comment gave me life (and hope), thank you!!!!

Some people do. And, given that the right is now doing what they always said the left would do but never quite did, and TCW so far has only been able to process it through the lens of “the right is acting like the left” hopefully he’s realizing what was actually going on.

I mean, you’ve got a point

Does he…know Jamaicans are native English speakers?

You’re finally getting it!!!! And it’s not because “tHey’re learNiNg to be censOrIUs frOm the LeFt!” it’s because they never cared about free speech to begin with. And if the argument was never good faith, what does that leave us with?

Has it occurred to you that maybe, just maybe, when Group A says X is bad when Group B is doing it, but then when they get half a chance they actually do it themselves, that Group A never really cared about X at all? Hypocrisy can be instructive but you seem not to be learning.

Friedersdorf seems utterly incapable of or uninterested in doing that.

That their motivations were never what they claimed they were.

Understanding when a person condemns something that they don’t actually care about the thing but have some ulterior motive is enormously instructive for being able to respond to them and working out their true intentions.

the thing that the hypocritical accuser claims. Nor is it that the accused is indemnified by the hypocrisy of the accuser.

The problem with hypocrisy, and the utility of pointing it out, is that it tells you that the accuser never really cared about the bad act.

hypocrites by pointing out Europe’s alleged free speech problems he can continue to tread his well worn “I’m just a reasonable guy who likes liberty” path.

What he doesn’t get is that the problem with hypocrisy is never that the accused isn’t actually doing

offers only the most superficial treatment of the Trump administration’s (and almost none of their sociocultural context), and manages to entirely miss the problem with conservative hypocrisy.

He seems to think that pointing out that conservatives are being

You would think somebody who actually cares about civil liberties would be in a constant rage since the Trump administration came into power, and yet he still seems to manage to save his greatest concern for illiberal leftists,

What is with the weird, almost talismanic way people call Greenwald “consistent”? He countenances a level of insularity and corruption from Trump the likes of which he would excoriate a Democrat for, and then says he can’t stand hypocrisy. He’s not at all consistent except about Palestine.

Ότι είπε ουσιαστικά ότι τα στρατηγικά και εμπορικά ενδιαφέροντα της χώρας δίνονται μεγαλύτερη σημασία από τις ζωές χιλιάδων αμάχων (εκ των οποίων και πολλά παιδιά); Ντροπή μόνο.