Alice Xu
@alicexu.bsky.social
Assistant Professor at UPenn | Comparative inequality, urban & distributive politics, environmental politics, Latam | https://alicezxu.com/
Thanks for your interest in the paper!! We actually find the opposite: certain class of public goods ("unfunded public goods"), e.g., protecting public health, induce support for right populism
April 10, 2025 at 12:25 AM
Thanks for your interest in the paper!! We actually find the opposite: certain class of public goods ("unfunded public goods"), e.g., protecting public health, induce support for right populism
Thanks, Catherine! Big congrats too on this paper! Super cool– excited to read. Paula Rettl was also just here visiting Philadelphia this weekend :)
April 10, 2025 at 12:19 AM
Thanks, Catherine! Big congrats too on this paper! Super cool– excited to read. Paula Rettl was also just here visiting Philadelphia this weekend :)
The challenge for the Left is to turn unfunded public goods into funded ones: redistribute their concentrated costs using
–Job retention schemes
–Training and reskilling
–Redistributive compensation
Without credible compensation, right populists will continue to exploit the gap.
–Job retention schemes
–Training and reskilling
–Redistributive compensation
Without credible compensation, right populists will continue to exploit the gap.
April 3, 2025 at 5:55 PM
The challenge for the Left is to turn unfunded public goods into funded ones: redistribute their concentrated costs using
–Job retention schemes
–Training and reskilling
–Redistributive compensation
Without credible compensation, right populists will continue to exploit the gap.
–Job retention schemes
–Training and reskilling
–Redistributive compensation
Without credible compensation, right populists will continue to exploit the gap.
We also show negative future expectations predict Trump support:
Counties w/ more pessimistic future economic outlooks voted more heavily for Trump in 2016.
This long-term pessimism, rather than immediate economic loss, fuels right-wing populism.
Counties w/ more pessimistic future economic outlooks voted more heavily for Trump in 2016.
This long-term pessimism, rather than immediate economic loss, fuels right-wing populism.
April 3, 2025 at 5:54 PM
We also show negative future expectations predict Trump support:
Counties w/ more pessimistic future economic outlooks voted more heavily for Trump in 2016.
This long-term pessimism, rather than immediate economic loss, fuels right-wing populism.
Counties w/ more pessimistic future economic outlooks voted more heavily for Trump in 2016.
This long-term pessimism, rather than immediate economic loss, fuels right-wing populism.
Same pattern observed using an alternative measure: the share of jobs that can’t be done remotely (“teleworkability”).
April 3, 2025 at 5:53 PM
Same pattern observed using an alternative measure: the share of jobs that can’t be done remotely (“teleworkability”).
We leverage staggered timing of COVID business closures in the U.S.—a rare economic shock decoupled from race. Using an event study design, we find lockdowns boosted Trump support in states with more low-education workers, but had no effect in high-education ones.
April 3, 2025 at 5:51 PM
We leverage staggered timing of COVID business closures in the U.S.—a rare economic shock decoupled from race. Using an event study design, we find lockdowns boosted Trump support in states with more low-education workers, but had no effect in high-education ones.
These policies don’t require direct taxes. That’s precisely the problem:
They’re “cheap” for governments, yet disproportionately costly for certain workers—esp. those with lower educ or less flexible skills. Without compensation, these voters are vulnerable to populist appeals.
They’re “cheap” for governments, yet disproportionately costly for certain workers—esp. those with lower educ or less flexible skills. Without compensation, these voters are vulnerable to populist appeals.
April 3, 2025 at 5:46 PM
These policies don’t require direct taxes. That’s precisely the problem:
They’re “cheap” for governments, yet disproportionately costly for certain workers—esp. those with lower educ or less flexible skills. Without compensation, these voters are vulnerable to populist appeals.
They’re “cheap” for governments, yet disproportionately costly for certain workers—esp. those with lower educ or less flexible skills. Without compensation, these voters are vulnerable to populist appeals.
Unfunded public goods, policies that benefit the public but impose concentrated economic costs on specific groups, without compensating them, drives right-wing populism.
Think:
– COVID lockdowns
– Trade liberalization
– Climate policies
– Innovation and competition policy
Think:
– COVID lockdowns
– Trade liberalization
– Climate policies
– Innovation and competition policy
April 3, 2025 at 5:46 PM
Unfunded public goods, policies that benefit the public but impose concentrated economic costs on specific groups, without compensating them, drives right-wing populism.
Think:
– COVID lockdowns
– Trade liberalization
– Climate policies
– Innovation and competition policy
Think:
– COVID lockdowns
– Trade liberalization
– Climate policies
– Innovation and competition policy
Reposted by Alice Xu
2/6 🧵In @cpsjournal.bsky.social, @alicexu.bsky.social & Iversen ask if economic, rather than cultural factors, drive support for right-wing populists. Staggered DiD in the US & covid lockdowns. In states with less educated people (cannot work from home) lockdowns increase Trump support doi.org/pft7
April 3, 2025 at 1:59 PM
2/6 🧵In @cpsjournal.bsky.social, @alicexu.bsky.social & Iversen ask if economic, rather than cultural factors, drive support for right-wing populists. Staggered DiD in the US & covid lockdowns. In states with less educated people (cannot work from home) lockdowns increase Trump support doi.org/pft7
Yesss! 🥳🥂🤘 Thrilled for you –congratulations, Chagai!!
April 3, 2025 at 4:41 PM
Yesss! 🥳🥂🤘 Thrilled for you –congratulations, Chagai!!