TIRAMISU - WE ARE SO BACK!

Moreover, lie and falsity attributions correlated strongly in our between-subjects design. In a follow-up experiment (in only three countries), we found this strong correlation also with a within-subject design design. Preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps...

In one condition, we asked whether the speaker lied, in another whether what s/he said was true or false. Although DIs can be considered borderline cases (true on the explicit level, false on the implicit level), we found a high degree of similarity between the ten countries.

In our main experiment, we presented participants from ten countries (Chile, China, Germany, Israel, Japan, Mexico, South Africa, Spain, UK, US) with ten cases of deceptive implicatures (DIs). DIs are literally true but can nevertheless trick the hearer into a false belief.

and several keywords to describe your research interest to us. After we check it, we will add you to the system."

We are very grateful to the “Fachinformationsdienst Philosophie” who provides the hosting environment and helps to get the whole thing starting. We hope this and similar initiatives will become popular soon.

2. Experimental philosophers often have to compromise: Publishing in empirical journal often means to cut the philosophical aspects, while publishing in philosophy often comes with cuts regarding the empirical aspects

Editors:
Ivar Hannikainen
Alex Wiegmann
Pascale Willemsen

Editorial Board:
A. Alexandrova @annaalexandrova.bsky.social
J. Horvath
J. Knobe @xphilosopher.bsky.social
E. Machery @edouardmachery.bsky.social
I. Stojanovic @isidorastojanovic.bsky.social
J. Weinberg @jonathanweinberg.bsky.social

Congrats! Just curious: couldn't you intervene at proof stage (regarding the tables)?