Let me know if I missed something. Here's one of my old posts about fraud prevention alexholcombe.wordpress.com/2025/03/16/s...

Open science practices provide part of the records needed for data provenance or chain-of-custody trail. So in my view, open science policy updates need to consider fraud deterrence. Disappointed to see no consideration of the issue in the TOP guidelines update. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

For free. Or you can donate to Martin here Source: Wiley share.google/iA5tv2TAKrrN...

A few of the FB posts I published as the apoendix here share.google/iA5tv2TAKrrN...

If someone registers their blog or substack with rogue-scholar.org, all future posts will get a doi, and be archived i believe

I think OpenAlex does that.

True. They do the same thing with co-authorship.

Thanks, yes, and as with a number of metascience topics, it's even more shocking when you discover how few people are working on remedying it.

If you're interested in our Acknowledgments projects (been skeeting about them a bit previously) you can get on our list with this form docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...

:) See @ojcollective.bsky.social , launching in earnest soon

katinamagazine.org/content/arti... by @heroicendeavour.bsky.social

since their beginning. One such I am involved with is the Wikijournal of Science en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJou...

that has been captured by corporations, running a game that our universities continue to support, while neglecting alternatives.

many died out, some are thriving, and many are struggling to survive. A reason they struggle is that they it's difficult to sustain themselves outside of the journal impact and prestige system

out there, ever since Harnad's "scholarly skywriting" of 1987 and the dawn of the modern open science movement around 2005. Lots of community scientific publishing initiatives such as diamond open access journals and platforms were started,

Tenzing will also gently encourage best practices for Acknowledgments sections, by modeling them in its outputs.
We are interested in talking to groups (like statistical consulting units or library professionals) who are frequently not acknowledged appropriately in papers about how this might help.

By providing a place to write down information about the people you should acknowledge rather than just your co-authors, you will be less likely, come submisison time, to forget to include them in the acknowledgments. #metascience

#integrity