🗯️ friendly anti-fascist off the dome 🧠✨
“When I became a senior judge in 2013, my successor was appointed, so my resignation will not create a vacancy to be filled by the president.”
- - -
Gift link: www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2025/1...
“When I became a senior judge in 2013, my successor was appointed, so my resignation will not create a vacancy to be filled by the president.”
- - -
Gift link: www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2025/1...
“When I became a senior judge in 2013, my successor was appointed, so my resignation will not create a vacancy to be filled by the president.”
- - -
Gift link: www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2025/1...
“When I became a senior judge in 2013, my successor was appointed, so my resignation will not create a vacancy to be filled by the president.”
- - -
Gift link: www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2025/1...
EPSTEIN: Duh
EPSTEIN: Duh
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Schumer-- Schumer is a basket case.
NORAH O'DONNELL: --when the troops don't get a paycheck?
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Schumer-- Schumer is a basket case.
NORAH O'DONNELL: --when the troops don't get a paycheck?
THIS is 👇👇👇
- $170B for ICE
- $117B in tax cuts for the rich
- $40B for Argentina
- $250M for a vanity ballroom
- $230M in DOJ payments to Trump
- $172M for Kristi Noem’s jets
- $100M on golf
#TrumpShutdown
#OpenTheGov
#ReleaseTheEpsteinFiles
#NoKings
THIS is 👇👇👇
- $170B for ICE
- $117B in tax cuts for the rich
- $40B for Argentina
- $250M for a vanity ballroom
- $230M in DOJ payments to Trump
- $172M for Kristi Noem’s jets
- $100M on golf
#TrumpShutdown
#OpenTheGov
#ReleaseTheEpsteinFiles
#NoKings
WHAT’S AT STAKE?
Section 2 is the primary way that plaintiffs can challenge discriminatory election practices. It holds greater weight after the court in 2013 ruled to remove another section requiring certain states with a history of discriminatory voting practices…
1/5
WHAT’S AT STAKE?
Section 2 is the primary way that plaintiffs can challenge discriminatory election practices. It holds greater weight after the court in 2013 ruled to remove another section requiring certain states with a history of discriminatory voting practices…
1/5