Here the students will explore the anticipatory politics surrounding oil which is actively shaping economic activity in the present moment. At the same time students will engage with the community to outline pathways for prefigurative politics for creating a just and fair urban economy.

Meanwhile, China is going to continue to focus on building capacity in advanced manufacturing and dominating clean-tech and digital sectors, while the US continues to fall behind.

This is Trumps "Art of the Deal" - all show and no substance from a reality TV personality. And we have been through this before - just look at Foxconn in Wisconsin eu.jsonline.com/story/money/...

They will be highly automated, foreign-owned, and result in few economic spillovers in the places they are located. The proposed investments will be largely inflated, but in reality the investments will at a much lower scale than initially proposed.

For example, reintroduce EV subsidies to stimulate investment in EV manufacturing to cover the shortfall of US automotive markets.

We suspect that similar contradictions are likely to be found in industries that require capital intensive infrastructure development where the dimensions of ownership, commodification and risk-allocation are present such as critical minerals, hydrogen and CCS.

We find that the resource-making interventions needed to deliver natural gas to markets contradicted with the configurations of ownership, commodification, and risk allocation through which the Indonesian government has sought to realize state strategies.

The discussion in the paper is informed by an empirical case study of failed plans by the Indonesian government from 2016 to 2019 to draw upon public-private partnerships to create markets for LNG in the peripheral regions of the country.

The configurations of ownership, commodification, and risk allocation that states draw on will vary based on ideological, political, and economic reasons related to state strategies. The success of these strategies will depend on the alignment of public-private interests.

We posit that when private capital fails to create markets for resources on its own initiative, states may intervene by facilitating resource-making and governing market development through configurations of ownership, commodification, and risk allocation.

We coin the term "the resource-making" state to describe states that play an active role in resource-making and governance related to the development of markets. Resource-Making refers to entails attention to interventions deployed to exploit and commercialize nature.

In the article we argue that geopolitical uncertainty, climate change, and new technologies are leading resource-producing states to take a more active role in creating markets for resources, but doing so requires complex material transformations.