alex-to.bsky.social
alex-to.bsky.social
@alex-to.bsky.social
I'm not impressed at all the central quebec con voters though. Too much for comfort.
April 29, 2025 at 12:48 PM
This tweet is so dumb my only viable theory is that he is doing it on purpose because he wants us to vote for the liberals for some unfathomable 4D chess reason 🤣
April 28, 2025 at 1:14 PM
You are doing the right thing. Letting them lead, listening to them. They might not have shown signs to you but that doesn't mean they haven't been thinking about it for a while. They can try it out and experiment with reversible changes and see how it works for them.
April 22, 2025 at 8:04 PM
Reposted by alex-to.bsky.social
if you’re putting actual harm on the backburner to say, “hang on, we need to discuss verbiage & i brought my merriam webster. because i think a reason your extermination is proceeding apace is because this vocabulary is cringe” we’re already dead by the time you figure out what we can & can’t say.
April 13, 2025 at 11:56 PM
I'm very much on Rachel's side in this, but since English is not my first language I have to ask, the tweet Jesse references *does* seem to connect some people connected to the convoy to the arson attempt. I read it as "why would you do this, it hurts your cause". Is there sthing im missing here?
April 10, 2025 at 5:16 PM
That is something I really am curious about. Also wondering why its not talked about more (but I admit I am not up to date with Canadian politics, so ty Rachel). Is it even possible to be prime minister without having security clearance ? And what's Poilievre's story for not getting it ????
March 25, 2025 at 4:47 PM