Alex
@alex-fiddes.bsky.social
Unashamed Corbynite and rubbish chess player
...Ukraine isn't in NATO?
Ignore reality all you like 👍
Ignore reality all you like 👍
June 2, 2025 at 11:23 AM
...Ukraine isn't in NATO?
Ignore reality all you like 👍
Ignore reality all you like 👍
Good lord, I wonder if you're trying to make this hard work.
No, I was responding to your remark that "a relatively junior MP does not decide...the offer to the country" with an example of just that. The conversation above spirals all the way up to our initial argument. You're a slippery operator
No, I was responding to your remark that "a relatively junior MP does not decide...the offer to the country" with an example of just that. The conversation above spirals all the way up to our initial argument. You're a slippery operator
June 2, 2025 at 10:51 AM
Good lord, I wonder if you're trying to make this hard work.
No, I was responding to your remark that "a relatively junior MP does not decide...the offer to the country" with an example of just that. The conversation above spirals all the way up to our initial argument. You're a slippery operator
No, I was responding to your remark that "a relatively junior MP does not decide...the offer to the country" with an example of just that. The conversation above spirals all the way up to our initial argument. You're a slippery operator
"I pay attention"
I never mentioned the conference, that was someone else 🤦♂️
I never mentioned the conference, that was someone else 🤦♂️
June 2, 2025 at 9:01 AM
"I pay attention"
I never mentioned the conference, that was someone else 🤦♂️
I never mentioned the conference, that was someone else 🤦♂️
..? What are you on about? I'm well aware Johsnon wasn't the opponent in 2017. You said the reason he won (in 2019) was the result of the 2017 election. Please plainly address the likes of Peter Mandelson openly working every day to make sure Corbyn lost. Why can't you?
June 2, 2025 at 8:59 AM
..? What are you on about? I'm well aware Johsnon wasn't the opponent in 2017. You said the reason he won (in 2019) was the result of the 2017 election. Please plainly address the likes of Peter Mandelson openly working every day to make sure Corbyn lost. Why can't you?
Im sorry if you struggle with two separate examples. That was rapid, I'll try and move slower for you.
Yes, he should've sacked the whole lot of the rebels. Him not being as dirty and cutthroat as the likes of Starmer definitely didn't help, you're right. Better character for PM though, sadly.
Yes, he should've sacked the whole lot of the rebels. Him not being as dirty and cutthroat as the likes of Starmer definitely didn't help, you're right. Better character for PM though, sadly.
June 2, 2025 at 8:57 AM
Im sorry if you struggle with two separate examples. That was rapid, I'll try and move slower for you.
Yes, he should've sacked the whole lot of the rebels. Him not being as dirty and cutthroat as the likes of Starmer definitely didn't help, you're right. Better character for PM though, sadly.
Yes, he should've sacked the whole lot of the rebels. Him not being as dirty and cutthroat as the likes of Starmer definitely didn't help, you're right. Better character for PM though, sadly.
Tonyman blocked me just for reiterating his own war expertise...and admittedly tagging on a little war expert horniness. Ah well
June 2, 2025 at 8:50 AM
Tonyman blocked me just for reiterating his own war expertise...and admittedly tagging on a little war expert horniness. Ah well
Sorry.
The war experts are surprisingly openly horny too.
Sorry again.
The war experts are surprisingly openly horny too.
Sorry again.
June 2, 2025 at 8:44 AM
Sorry.
The war experts are surprisingly openly horny too.
Sorry again.
The war experts are surprisingly openly horny too.
Sorry again.
Don't be daft. I don't agree with any states killing people anywhere, but it's surprisingly (maybe) commonplace. Cyber and nukes all part of Western arsenal too.
I'm sure you were equally concerned with the overthrowing of a democratically elected Russian-friendly gov't
I'm sure you were equally concerned with the overthrowing of a democratically elected Russian-friendly gov't
June 2, 2025 at 8:32 AM
Don't be daft. I don't agree with any states killing people anywhere, but it's surprisingly (maybe) commonplace. Cyber and nukes all part of Western arsenal too.
I'm sure you were equally concerned with the overthrowing of a democratically elected Russian-friendly gov't
I'm sure you were equally concerned with the overthrowing of a democratically elected Russian-friendly gov't
Can you point to anything Putin has said that suggests he intends to attack us? Genuinely curious.
There's no doubt the West's meddling in Ukraine has stoked tensions. Some people make lots of money from war, most of us don't.
Would love to know your endgame plan for this conflict if you have one
There's no doubt the West's meddling in Ukraine has stoked tensions. Some people make lots of money from war, most of us don't.
Would love to know your endgame plan for this conflict if you have one
June 2, 2025 at 8:20 AM
Can you point to anything Putin has said that suggests he intends to attack us? Genuinely curious.
There's no doubt the West's meddling in Ukraine has stoked tensions. Some people make lots of money from war, most of us don't.
Would love to know your endgame plan for this conflict if you have one
There's no doubt the West's meddling in Ukraine has stoked tensions. Some people make lots of money from war, most of us don't.
Would love to know your endgame plan for this conflict if you have one
Who knows? Your new cookies policy is a disgrace, fuck you 🖕
June 2, 2025 at 8:12 AM
Who knows? Your new cookies policy is a disgrace, fuck you 🖕
Actually that's just untrue. In August 2019, Starmer broke ranks to announce to the Guardian something that wasn't party policy - that "Labour is the party of remain". That was obviously an attempt at an offer to the country.
June 2, 2025 at 7:51 AM
Actually that's just untrue. In August 2019, Starmer broke ranks to announce to the Guardian something that wasn't party policy - that "Labour is the party of remain". That was obviously an attempt at an offer to the country.
That wasn't the narrative at the time, you guys have added that to suit. In 2017 none of the papers gave Corbyn a remote chance, and there was relative shock at the result.
Do you think people like Peter Mandelson doing something "every single day" to make sure Corbyn didn't win helped Johnson?
Do you think people like Peter Mandelson doing something "every single day" to make sure Corbyn didn't win helped Johnson?
June 2, 2025 at 7:37 AM
That wasn't the narrative at the time, you guys have added that to suit. In 2017 none of the papers gave Corbyn a remote chance, and there was relative shock at the result.
Do you think people like Peter Mandelson doing something "every single day" to make sure Corbyn didn't win helped Johnson?
Do you think people like Peter Mandelson doing something "every single day" to make sure Corbyn didn't win helped Johnson?
Just because something claims to be democratic doesn't make it so. You're being very disingenuous.
We've got another 5 years of Tory incompetence and corruption, then we'll get Reform. Give yourself a pat on the back, hope you're proud and happy
We've got another 5 years of Tory incompetence and corruption, then we'll get Reform. Give yourself a pat on the back, hope you're proud and happy
June 2, 2025 at 7:32 AM
Just because something claims to be democratic doesn't make it so. You're being very disingenuous.
We've got another 5 years of Tory incompetence and corruption, then we'll get Reform. Give yourself a pat on the back, hope you're proud and happy
We've got another 5 years of Tory incompetence and corruption, then we'll get Reform. Give yourself a pat on the back, hope you're proud and happy
Lol that is an insane non sequitur. Again, you're being deliberately slippery to avoid the point. We both know what democracy entails, you're just shying away from the obvious fact that you don't particularly care about it. Especially when it suits your grim narrative...
June 1, 2025 at 3:48 PM
Lol that is an insane non sequitur. Again, you're being deliberately slippery to avoid the point. We both know what democracy entails, you're just shying away from the obvious fact that you don't particularly care about it. Especially when it suits your grim narrative...
I asked you to answer a simple question plainly and truthfully, but you are just unable to do it. You guys are something else.
Once again, he did pretty damn well considering how desperately hard you lot worked against him. Once again, congrats on Red-tie Tories and Reform to come 👏👏👏
Once again, he did pretty damn well considering how desperately hard you lot worked against him. Once again, congrats on Red-tie Tories and Reform to come 👏👏👏
June 1, 2025 at 3:31 PM
I asked you to answer a simple question plainly and truthfully, but you are just unable to do it. You guys are something else.
Once again, he did pretty damn well considering how desperately hard you lot worked against him. Once again, congrats on Red-tie Tories and Reform to come 👏👏👏
Once again, he did pretty damn well considering how desperately hard you lot worked against him. Once again, congrats on Red-tie Tories and Reform to come 👏👏👏
Do you genuinely believe that in a truly democratic system, you should be able to lose votes and go from your "worst election since 1935" to a "landslide victory" with a "thumping majority"? Please answer plainly and truthfully
June 1, 2025 at 3:23 PM
Do you genuinely believe that in a truly democratic system, you should be able to lose votes and go from your "worst election since 1935" to a "landslide victory" with a "thumping majority"? Please answer plainly and truthfully
Quick recap - he was naive enough to actually go for the broad church, including many on the right in the party in the shadow cab. He then got more people to vote for him than did for Starmer, despite you lot working tirelessly against him. Did remarkably well considering your insane efforts. 👏
June 1, 2025 at 1:44 PM
Quick recap - he was naive enough to actually go for the broad church, including many on the right in the party in the shadow cab. He then got more people to vote for him than did for Starmer, despite you lot working tirelessly against him. Did remarkably well considering your insane efforts. 👏
No, you're naive to discard other forces akin to McSweeney and Farage now.
Corbyn wasn't perfect, but blaming him after the way you lot treated him and did your utmost to make sure we couldn't have a decent left wing government is perverse.
Corbyn wasn't perfect, but blaming him after the way you lot treated him and did your utmost to make sure we couldn't have a decent left wing government is perverse.
June 1, 2025 at 12:53 PM
No, you're naive to discard other forces akin to McSweeney and Farage now.
Corbyn wasn't perfect, but blaming him after the way you lot treated him and did your utmost to make sure we couldn't have a decent left wing government is perverse.
Corbyn wasn't perfect, but blaming him after the way you lot treated him and did your utmost to make sure we couldn't have a decent left wing government is perverse.
Lol if you genuinely believe it's that simple, you are naive beyond belief. McSweeney and Farage running Labour policy atm lol
June 1, 2025 at 9:17 AM
Lol if you genuinely believe it's that simple, you are naive beyond belief. McSweeney and Farage running Labour policy atm lol
No it's not, and that's a gross oversimplification. Be honest - who decides policy in the Labour Party now? 🧐😉
June 1, 2025 at 8:06 AM
No it's not, and that's a gross oversimplification. Be honest - who decides policy in the Labour Party now? 🧐😉