Oh, so he "turned" to falsehoods, did he? And when, pray tell, did this magical shift happen?

The Free Speech Administration strikes again, I see

I couldn't have said it better myself

...apparently they have yet to manufacture a rationale.

One by one the dominoes fall. For Harvard and Columbia it was, ostensibly, about antisemitism. Here, well...

"The Federal Government's hottest club is "Houthi PC small group." It has EVERYTHING... accidental journalists, classified war plans, Marco Rubio thumbtyping, and that thing where a Defense Secretary posts bombing coordinates while a magazine editor watches in horror."

I would maintain that something has, in fact, "changed about that"

Let me just say this: if I want a newspaper focused on "personal liberties and free markets" I can read Bloomberg, The Economist, The Financial Times, and even the Wall Street Journal--all of which do a better job at this than the WaPo ever can.

Agreed, BUT! The article contains a truly incredible figure.

Picking our battles, I see

I can only assume DraftKings is ghostwriting for The Economist

The NYT really must stop this nonsense. Enough with this amateur anthropology. Are these beliefs bullshit, or are they not bullshit? If they are bullshit, then you, the journalist, must write, "he believes this, even though his beliefs are obviously bullshit."

No.