alelinapps.bsky.social
@alelinapps.bsky.social
The phrasing of the headline seems exceedingly optimistic…
October 14, 2025 at 3:12 PM
The phrasing of the headline seems exceedingly optimistic…
Defenestration…the great Russian pastime…
October 11, 2025 at 5:10 PM
Defenestration…the great Russian pastime…
Well, you would know if you knew ANYTHING about Copyright law… 🤪
(We REALLY need a universal sarcasm emoji)
(We REALLY need a universal sarcasm emoji)
September 29, 2025 at 3:58 PM
Well, you would know if you knew ANYTHING about Copyright law… 🤪
(We REALLY need a universal sarcasm emoji)
(We REALLY need a universal sarcasm emoji)
I think you mean he doesn’t intend it as a joke. It is very much a joke…
August 5, 2025 at 12:28 AM
I think you mean he doesn’t intend it as a joke. It is very much a joke…
Do I detect some snark? My point was we can’t let Trump’s enablers to deflect and say “that’s not what he meant“. This is why he got elected. His base really doesn’t realize he is an idiot. We need to always frame things as “yes, he is always an idiot, and this is another example.”
July 26, 2025 at 5:11 PM
Do I detect some snark? My point was we can’t let Trump’s enablers to deflect and say “that’s not what he meant“. This is why he got elected. His base really doesn’t realize he is an idiot. We need to always frame things as “yes, he is always an idiot, and this is another example.”
It’s not a nitpick. It’s a reframing. The way you said it was implying that in this one instance Trump was an idiot. My comment was Trump is always an idiot, but it does not get pointed out.
July 26, 2025 at 2:12 PM
It’s not a nitpick. It’s a reframing. The way you said it was implying that in this one instance Trump was an idiot. My comment was Trump is always an idiot, but it does not get pointed out.
He didn’t make him “look like an idiot”, Powell just shined a light on this particular idiocy. The man IS an idiot and shows it often. He just has too many enablers who will agree with any stupid thing he says. That’s how they hide it in plain sight.
July 26, 2025 at 1:39 PM
He didn’t make him “look like an idiot”, Powell just shined a light on this particular idiocy. The man IS an idiot and shows it often. He just has too many enablers who will agree with any stupid thing he says. That’s how they hide it in plain sight.
Maximizing your minimalism?
July 26, 2025 at 1:22 PM
Maximizing your minimalism?
That wasn’t Carroll v. Trump (either case). In Carrol, Trump was found liable for defamation. The case where Trump was convicted was People v. Trump (criminal). That was the election interference case with Stormy Daniels. The Carrol verdicts currently stand and are on appeal.
July 26, 2025 at 1:15 PM
That wasn’t Carroll v. Trump (either case). In Carrol, Trump was found liable for defamation. The case where Trump was convicted was People v. Trump (criminal). That was the election interference case with Stormy Daniels. The Carrol verdicts currently stand and are on appeal.
because “flight risk” isn’t a thing under civil law. Only a sovereign government can bring a criminal action in the US. Also, she can’t be tried twice for identical things, so the Feds can’t touch her unless they find other crimes. Also, perjury is rarely brought, especially by itself.
July 25, 2025 at 2:51 AM
because “flight risk” isn’t a thing under civil law. Only a sovereign government can bring a criminal action in the US. Also, she can’t be tried twice for identical things, so the Feds can’t touch her unless they find other crimes. Also, perjury is rarely brought, especially by itself.
Please, I beg you to stop and learn about the US legal system. The victims could sue her, and if she is found liable, not convicted because that doesn’t exist in civil law, the finder of fact can impose damages against her. Basically she will owe them $. She will not be held in prison… 1 of 2
July 25, 2025 at 2:51 AM
Please, I beg you to stop and learn about the US legal system. The victims could sue her, and if she is found liable, not convicted because that doesn’t exist in civil law, the finder of fact can impose damages against her. Basically she will owe them $. She will not be held in prison… 1 of 2
Took you long enough… 🤪
July 25, 2025 at 1:32 AM
Took you long enough… 🤪
This post hurts my brain in how wrong it is…if dufus pardons her, then she is completely free. That is our criminal system. If a state wants to try her, and she is convicted, then she goes to prison. Still criminal. Civil cases are about liability. You can’t be convicted in a civil trial.
July 25, 2025 at 1:18 AM
This post hurts my brain in how wrong it is…if dufus pardons her, then she is completely free. That is our criminal system. If a state wants to try her, and she is convicted, then she goes to prison. Still criminal. Civil cases are about liability. You can’t be convicted in a civil trial.
Something about blind squirrels and nuts…
July 24, 2025 at 3:59 AM
Something about blind squirrels and nuts…
They sold to Unilever which is trying to silence them. Don’t buy. Ben & Jerry want to buy it back, so let’s make it cheaper for them to do so…
May 15, 2025 at 3:03 AM
They sold to Unilever which is trying to silence them. Don’t buy. Ben & Jerry want to buy it back, so let’s make it cheaper for them to do so…
Seriously? You need to retire for good this time.
April 16, 2025 at 12:18 AM
Seriously? You need to retire for good this time.
No, Trump isn’t smart enough to come up with a formula. Someone pulled this out of their butt, and they went with it because none of them know better.
April 5, 2025 at 3:46 AM
No, Trump isn’t smart enough to come up with a formula. Someone pulled this out of their butt, and they went with it because none of them know better.
The problem being a majority of the Cabinet are just as nuts…
April 4, 2025 at 12:46 AM
The problem being a majority of the Cabinet are just as nuts…
He certainly wasn’t hired for his knowledge or competency…
March 25, 2025 at 3:59 AM
He certainly wasn’t hired for his knowledge or competency…