alastairw123.bsky.social
@alastairw123.bsky.social
Chris Boardman at Scottish cycling conference advocating active travel, and bike buses in particular
November 15, 2025 at 6:19 PM
Neither numbers nor random 😀
October 10, 2025 at 8:29 PM
Watts joules Seconds
October 10, 2025 at 8:28 PM
W = J / S
October 10, 2025 at 7:06 PM
whats a flyer ?
October 8, 2025 at 9:00 PM
I think the idea of ETRO is you put in a change,folk comment based on experience in first 6 months So if it was decided to change to option 1 after 6 months, how would that work ?
September 1, 2025 at 5:32 PM
Looks like it Apparently we can make comments now, but they just go on a big pile with those put in during the 6 months of consultation. Mind, I then get really confused about how “falling back to option 1” works in an ETRO.
September 1, 2025 at 5:30 PM
And yes, can have options, but with conditions ( I think) but the published diagrams don’t set those out ?
September 1, 2025 at 1:21 PM
Re first point The councils webpage says it is open for comments So why does this contradict your explanation?
September 1, 2025 at 1:19 PM
hi... I'm trying to get answers to 2 questions (1) can an ETRO contain options (ie the modal filters OR protected lanes) ? a quick check via chatgpt suggests not, but I've only seen the diagrams and (2) the website does solicit feedback from the general public (as per pic)
September 1, 2025 at 10:26 AM
... unless they're a trip hazard !
August 27, 2025 at 4:46 PM
And oddly, corners of Facebook believe they are puppets of the evil cycling sustrans
August 15, 2025 at 8:55 PM
I think this is the legislation www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/61.... A quick search suggests no references to cost/budget/timescales; therefore (being simplistic) that's all outwith statutory scope & therefore outwith ToR for sub-committee.
The Local Authorities' Traffic Orders (Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 1999
These Regulations prescribe the procedure to be followed by local traffic authorities in Scotland for making the main types of traffic and parking orders under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984. Th...
www.legislation.gov.uk
August 14, 2025 at 11:57 AM
understand... but is the timing within scope of 'statutory part' of TROs ? if not, shouldn't the chair move discussion on (or have a vote) ?
August 14, 2025 at 11:50 AM
sorry...I was tripping over you with my extra notes :-)
August 14, 2025 at 11:46 AM
My reading of the ToR for Sub-committee suggests that funding/pacing of replacement is out-of-scope for the sub-committee (its outwith the statutory element of TROs). Anybody know if that's right ? and if-so, why did the chair not step in ?
August 14, 2025 at 11:44 AM
Aug mtg had same report input. My understanding is that only the trip hazard objection was contentious, and officals verbally said that permanent infra would slowly replace over time. Cllr Lang's issue is whether there's budget (etc) to do that replacement. And seemingly no progress made in Aug
August 14, 2025 at 11:41 AM
I'm trying to get my head round how TROs & sub-comm works, using this example. Its quasi-judical, and is there to respond to consultations & approve. For this one there were 34 objections, of which 7 were trip hazards. Officials were inclined to ignore; but discussion carried from May mtg to Aug
August 14, 2025 at 11:38 AM
It could be that cycle lane is under an existing etro When it expires, the cycle lanes go So this one then implements the no waiting?
August 12, 2025 at 7:28 PM
Double checked this am and road not fixed
August 9, 2025 at 10:42 AM
How reliable do you think the dates are ? 3 weeks ago I took this copy, after the end date shown for work. It’s disappeared and I don’t think work done ( been away for a week and not checked)
August 9, 2025 at 6:17 AM
As I think I said ( stuffs a bit blurry) in Richmond, that is a fantastic looking bike
August 6, 2025 at 5:15 PM