So I'll be here. Thanks to everyone else who is here.

And also, sorry if I'm missing so many posts. There should really be an algorithm of some kind ;) (not.)

Well, I view it this way, if someone wants to find me, they will find me here.

I do believe that most others have moved to LinkedIn but I am no longer interested in algorithms that sort posts for me. Likewise, I am bewildered by the constant stream of LinkedIn emails seeking to engage me.

No, but my organic chemistry is a bit rusty. Still trying to work out how to react a traditional advent season cake from a Viennese cemetery ...

How about the Inorganic Compounds cup? ;)

Am I missing a subtlety here?

* restricts free speech in a way that does not, as far as I can tell, resemble any of the far more narrow free speech restrictions of which I am aware. This here would cover publication of non-sensitive scientific results where coauthorship may arise for a host of entirely benign reasons.

Is my understanding correct that this bill would withhold federal funding from a researcher for coauthoring even unrelated scientific publications with individuals affiliated with any institutions in specific countries?
If so, I wonder how is this constitutional? It restricts free speech ...

Ah. Yes. Roses are red. Violets are ... not purple. Makes sense.

I probably missed that the discourse exists?

Sure enough, purple in the white light, too. Just no single-color purple lights around where I was.

Uh, good luck. PBE+ Tkatchenko-Scheffler + free energy works for the Tp phase diagram IIRC

Umm. That would be a problem ... no?

(If you're wondering why I am posting this. I really think our Pratt School 360 first-year advising program is one of the best things we ever did. If nothing else, I learned so much about the first-year experience and what this university actually is about. Go Duke.)