Personally, I play ek on player props to FD or just player props with minimal comps. I play qk on most bets, especially player props. I would not recommend more than qk for player props. I play hk when 2 or more sharps agree it’s a good play or it’s good to a sharp with high limits (1000+)

When to play hk vs qk vs ek? There is no source of truth for this but essentially higher confidence in the bet (more points of reference or sharps) the more likely you should play hk or qk

Devig to pinny/espn avg. Good to pinny on its own. 3.4% EV recommend .8u qk. I am playing hk

Devig to mkt avg. Good for 1.3u

This play is good to circa (-140/110). Good for 2u qk. Hurry!!

Pinnacle is considered the pioneer of sharp books (along with Circa) but each market and league is different. For NHL goalscorers pinnacle and espnbet are the sharpest, so I avg my devig to them. If one book hasn’t posted (usually pinny), I would still feel comfortable with the bet, just size down

This play is very good to pinnacle (106/-142), which is below caesars. Pinnacle/espnbet avg devig (worst-case) are my parameters. Recommend .7u

Hey guys, if you like sports betting or want to learn more about +EV betting, follow me! I’ll be posting plays and educational content about extra value betting and more

Good value here on bet365. Devig is to espnbet but also good to market. Playing .4u