Jeroen 🔸
@ahappier.world
🎬 YouTuber (youtube.com/ahappierworldyt)
💡 Active in EA Belgium
🔸 10% Pledge #9211 at givingwhatwecan.org/pledge
📍 Brussels
🌱 #sentientist #effectivealtruism
"Yeroon" /jəˈʀuːn/ (he/him)
💡 Active in EA Belgium
🔸 10% Pledge #9211 at givingwhatwecan.org/pledge
📍 Brussels
🌱 #sentientist #effectivealtruism
"Yeroon" /jəˈʀuːn/ (he/him)
Claude wouldn't share what music he listens to.
April 5, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Claude wouldn't share what music he listens to.
Woah, thanks, better than GPT4.5!!
March 21, 2025 at 8:30 AM
Woah, thanks, better than GPT4.5!!
One of my custom ChatGPT instructions is to apply bayesian reasoning and to give percentages when answering. It rarely actually did that but now with the "Reason" function it's always doing that, even in situations where it's clearly a silly idea. (prompt is an example, not a real request)
![Prompt: "Write an email to a client explaining why you think a Meta Ads campaign didn't go as well as we thought it would." Response: "Reasoned for 4 seconds
Subject: Follow-up on Our Recent Meta Ads Campaign
Hi [Client Name],
I hope you’re doing well. I wanted to share some thoughts on why I believe our Meta Ads campaign didn’t perform as well as we hoped.
After looking closely at our data and comparing it with past campaigns, I estimate with about a 70% confidence that our audience targeting was a key issue. In other words, it seems likely that the people we reached weren’t the ideal match for our product. Additionally, there’s roughly a 60% chance that our ad creative didn’t resonate strongly enough with viewers, which might have led to lower engagement than expected.
I arrived at these estimates by updating my initial assumptions with the new performance data we gathered from our internal analytics dashboard, combined with industry trends and insights from previous campaigns. This Bayesian approach helped me weigh the evidence and determine where the biggest gaps might be. [...]"](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:6ed7k32g7htfotwdd2yrisup/bafkreiaw2b27zjwiil6vf3tiqdi3rfiewt3dzzb2rmdjcl3nnqea2pnoly@jpeg)
February 14, 2025 at 10:08 AM
One of my custom ChatGPT instructions is to apply bayesian reasoning and to give percentages when answering. It rarely actually did that but now with the "Reason" function it's always doing that, even in situations where it's clearly a silly idea. (prompt is an example, not a real request)
This surprised me! I wasn't actually mad at Google because I figured they were just following a protocol. But to also translate it to Dutch? Why?
February 12, 2025 at 10:31 AM
This surprised me! I wasn't actually mad at Google because I figured they were just following a protocol. But to also translate it to Dutch? Why?
I can't get over how silly this is
January 4, 2025 at 11:23 PM
I can't get over how silly this is
This is just sad
www.theguardian.com/food/2024/no...
www.theguardian.com/food/2024/no...
November 23, 2024 at 4:11 PM
This is just sad
www.theguardian.com/food/2024/no...
www.theguardian.com/food/2024/no...
At this rate I may reach a 1000 followers faster on 🦋 than 🐦
November 23, 2024 at 10:02 AM
At this rate I may reach a 1000 followers faster on 🦋 than 🐦
Labelers are useful for this :) bsky.app/profile/aimo...
November 21, 2024 at 7:57 AM
Labelers are useful for this :) bsky.app/profile/aimo...
This is straight up inaccurate. One of the oldest EA organizations is Giving What We Can, which encourages people to donate at least 10% of their income. Most of this money is going to effective global health and development charities. (1/2)
November 10, 2024 at 1:34 PM
This is straight up inaccurate. One of the oldest EA organizations is Giving What We Can, which encourages people to donate at least 10% of their income. Most of this money is going to effective global health and development charities. (1/2)