Yes it's great that China is actually reducing their CO2 emissions, but it takes more than one country (even though it's one of the biggest,) to stop climate change.
Accept this as a win and prepare to move forward with further climate action.
Yes it's great that China is actually reducing their CO2 emissions, but it takes more than one country (even though it's one of the biggest,) to stop climate change.
Accept this as a win and prepare to move forward with further climate action.
The strategy of "do nothing and move further right" seems like it's gonna stay, lmao
The strategy of "do nothing and move further right" seems like it's gonna stay, lmao
And before you cite that Taiwan has a one china policy, that's the conservatives there. Most leftists and non-conservatives there think that Taiwan should be its own sovereign state separate from China
And before you cite that Taiwan has a one china policy, that's the conservatives there. Most leftists and non-conservatives there think that Taiwan should be its own sovereign state separate from China
Same goes for Taiwan. If China TRULY aimed to secure its own borders, why are they so aggressive toward a sovereign country. Even if it is theirs, they should be more diplomatic rather than aggressive, no?
Same goes for Taiwan. If China TRULY aimed to secure its own borders, why are they so aggressive toward a sovereign country. Even if it is theirs, they should be more diplomatic rather than aggressive, no?
www.cfr.org/global-confl...
Even if the Philippines are a "US ally," that isn't securing China whatsoever.
1
www.cfr.org/global-confl...
Even if the Philippines are a "US ally," that isn't securing China whatsoever.
1
What if say, Mexico put up a firewall to prevent "eastern meddling," blocking all Chinese sources from the country. That's at minimum, what China is doing
What if say, Mexico put up a firewall to prevent "eastern meddling," blocking all Chinese sources from the country. That's at minimum, what China is doing
Reporters without borders (very helpful and active when documenting Israel's crimes) document China as a hell for censorship.
rsf.org/en/index?yea...
Reporters without borders (very helpful and active when documenting Israel's crimes) document China as a hell for censorship.
rsf.org/en/index?yea...
www.hrw.org/news/2020/09...
www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
People should have the right to access media, regardless of what it contains. It's different than banning nazis on a social media platform, it's about control
www.hrw.org/news/2020/09...
www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
People should have the right to access media, regardless of what it contains. It's different than banning nazis on a social media platform, it's about control
english.www.gov.cn/archive/laws...
english.www.gov.cn/archive/laws...
www.ispionline.it/en/publicati...
China still supports traditional gender roles, just like plenty of places in the US.
www.ispionline.it/en/publicati...
China still supports traditional gender roles, just like plenty of places in the US.
www.ilo.org/publications...
www.ilo.org/publications...
williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/press/china-...
And finally
www.scmp.com/news/china/p...
Something literally from the south china morning post.
williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/press/china-...
And finally
www.scmp.com/news/china/p...
Something literally from the south china morning post.
This is a non-US-based source that is from multiple different writers. It's a collaborative effort, basically. You can't ignore my points and just call everything propaganda.
How can you call yourself a socialist when you ignore the most basic evidence?
This is a non-US-based source that is from multiple different writers. It's a collaborative effort, basically. You can't ignore my points and just call everything propaganda.
How can you call yourself a socialist when you ignore the most basic evidence?
You do seem to be quite naive if you're ignoring every source I post, calling it "american propaganda"
You do seem to be quite naive if you're ignoring every source I post, calling it "american propaganda"
Show me your sources.
Show me your sources.