Dr Agata Dymarska
agatadymarska.bsky.social
Dr Agata Dymarska
@agatadymarska.bsky.social
April 27, 2025 at 7:27 PM
April 27, 2025 at 4:57 PM
We found that in an incidental memory task, body-related information still increased false alarms, supporting the somatic attention account.
The findings highlight the importance of distinctiveness in word memory and the complex role of semantic richness effects in memory.
7/7
April 27, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Alternatively, the somatic attention account suggests that attending to body-related content leads to automatic activation of additional bodily experiences (such as touch or proprioception), increasing memory confusability.
6/7
April 27, 2025 at 4:57 PM
There are two potential explanations: Since body information is critical for survival, it's possible that semantic elaboration during (expected) memory tasks activates a broad range of related information, leading to more confusable memory traces.
5/7
April 27, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Second paper: our first Registered Report!🎯
We examined incidental memory for words to test two competing ideas about effects of body-related information.
sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Previous work showed that body-related experience impairs word memory by inflating false alarms...
4/7
April 27, 2025 at 4:57 PM
This allowed us to tap into more distant associates and individual variation in the trajectory of responses. Local chaining with the preceding response was the strongest source of activation throughout the task, although the cue provided a global constraint.
3/7
April 27, 2025 at 4:57 PM
We found that linguistic information from an immediately preceding response (rather than the cue) was the primary driver of associations, with some contribution of immediate sensorimotor relationships.
We asked participants to produce 20 associates per cue...
2/7
April 27, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Bonus: Word knowledge task (asking if participants know the meaning of the word) seems to tap into similar mechanisms as word recognition (determining whether the stimulus is a real word). 3/3
@wauampoznan.bsky.social
@cambup-linguistics.bsky.social
April 2, 2025 at 12:15 PM
Non-native speakers rely more on lexical characteristics and familiarity with the word form than on deep semantic processing. Bodily sensation and experience also contributed to reported word knowledge, suggesting that embodied cognition plays a role in L2 processing. 2/3
April 2, 2025 at 12:15 PM