AfroBiotech
@afrobiotech.bsky.social
We read the papers AND the room.
Scientists doing it right, we see you. Half-@ssed biotech design and funding gatekeepers - you are not enough. Managed by @drkhaynes
Scientists doing it right, we see you. Half-@ssed biotech design and funding gatekeepers - you are not enough. Managed by @drkhaynes
It quells anxiety. I suspect that anxiety is a common, debilitating challenge for very brainy people.
January 10, 2026 at 3:02 AM
It quells anxiety. I suspect that anxiety is a common, debilitating challenge for very brainy people.
Maybe somebody realized that if you go the anti-DEI route you have to start talking about race, and their position would be more visibly/ covertly racist. Those of us who have the actual receipts of discrimination against us would win that battle.
January 9, 2026 at 6:25 PM
Maybe somebody realized that if you go the anti-DEI route you have to start talking about race, and their position would be more visibly/ covertly racist. Those of us who have the actual receipts of discrimination against us would win that battle.
Do better, History Channel. 🙄 That is lazy production. Not only did he enable the success of peanut butter, he was an agrotechnology visionary.
January 5, 2026 at 2:38 PM
Do better, History Channel. 🙄 That is lazy production. Not only did he enable the success of peanut butter, he was an agrotechnology visionary.
Folks act like biotech is brand new. Turns out, this man was doing biotech with peanuts & sweet potatoes since the early 1900s. GW Carver’s lived reality & genius gave us agricultural biotechnology, plant-based materials, and sustainable systems thinking, long before “biotech” became a buzzword.
January 5, 2026 at 2:18 PM
Folks act like biotech is brand new. Turns out, this man was doing biotech with peanuts & sweet potatoes since the early 1900s. GW Carver’s lived reality & genius gave us agricultural biotechnology, plant-based materials, and sustainable systems thinking, long before “biotech” became a buzzword.
This isn’t a “diversity problem.”
It’s a design and funding problem. Narrow test populations + lazy assumptions = exclusion by default. The fix?
Design for all humans from the start & fund the engineers already doing it right, like Dr. Jasmine Kwasa. 🧠✨ www.precisionneuroscopics.com
It’s a design and funding problem. Narrow test populations + lazy assumptions = exclusion by default. The fix?
Design for all humans from the start & fund the engineers already doing it right, like Dr. Jasmine Kwasa. 🧠✨ www.precisionneuroscopics.com
Precision Neuroscopics
www.precisionneuroscopics.com
January 3, 2026 at 2:37 AM
This isn’t a “diversity problem.”
It’s a design and funding problem. Narrow test populations + lazy assumptions = exclusion by default. The fix?
Design for all humans from the start & fund the engineers already doing it right, like Dr. Jasmine Kwasa. 🧠✨ www.precisionneuroscopics.com
It’s a design and funding problem. Narrow test populations + lazy assumptions = exclusion by default. The fix?
Design for all humans from the start & fund the engineers already doing it right, like Dr. Jasmine Kwasa. 🧠✨ www.precisionneuroscopics.com