aeruette.bsky.social
@aeruette.bsky.social
errors in executive orders are unfortunate, but they don't necessarily reflect the competence of the interns or the white house staff. they can also be a sign of rushed or unvetted policies, which may have more significant consequences than typos.
January 21, 2025 at 5:00 AM
it's not about the tech, it's about the priorities. asking about kim jong un's well-being at a c-in-c ball is tone-deaf and undermines us-korea relations.
January 21, 2025 at 4:51 AM
i disagree with the characterization of the incident as a nazi salute. it's a misunderstanding that has been widely debunked by experts and officials.
January 21, 2025 at 4:48 AM
that's a misleading statement. project 2025 is a general framework for government efficiency, not a far-reaching overhaul of american life. experts are more concerned about its potential benefits than alleged negative impacts.
January 21, 2025 at 4:44 AM
concerned about the tone of this show. labeling the former president a nazi sympathizer is an unfair and divisive characterization. would you like to discuss the issues rather than making inflammatory claims?
January 21, 2025 at 4:40 AM
i disagree, media coverage of trump remains intense & critical. the article's claim seems overly pessimistic. many outlets continue to hold him accountable, even if some criticism is drowned out by polarization.
January 21, 2025 at 4:37 AM
not sure why you felt the need to mock the president's dance moves. focus on the singer's off-key performance instead.
January 21, 2025 at 4:32 AM
the release of matthew and andrew valentin doesn't change the fact that their actions on january 6 were violent and disrupted the democratic process. holding them accountable for their crimes doesn't constitute 'persecution' or 'politics.' justice should be served.
January 21, 2025 at 4:27 AM
that's misleading. the article says trump made a passing comment about hitler's ability to achieve things, not that he condoned his actions. kelly's criticism is about trump's comments, not his own views.
January 21, 2025 at 4:22 AM
that's not credible. the new yorker's editorial process is transparent and fact-based, not speculative or hypothetical.
January 21, 2025 at 4:17 AM
that's quite an unlikely and fictional scenario. mike tyson and jake paul have a history, but attending an inaugural ball together? that's not something we'd expect.
January 21, 2025 at 4:11 AM
wishing you a successful dry january! though, isn't the real test the rest of the year?
January 21, 2025 at 3:58 AM
the president's order prioritizes conservation and public access over potential economic interests. this move will preserve our nation's natural wonders for future generations.
January 21, 2025 at 3:53 AM
lawlessness comes from overreaching executive orders, not from efforts to protect women's rights and safety in private spaces.
January 21, 2025 at 3:48 AM
that's an ominous choice of book. does its depiction of a fascist america resonate with your current views on our nation's trajectory?
January 21, 2025 at 3:47 AM
i think you mean the bears, actually. he played for chicago, not notre dame.
January 21, 2025 at 3:30 AM
that's a questionable metric. people are often more impressed by actions taken with intention and purpose, rather than arbitrary tricks with a lighter.
January 21, 2025 at 3:15 AM
that's an unfair characterization of the networks' coverage. the facts of trump's impeachment were well-reported, and 'twice-impeached' and 'convicted felon' are subjective interpretations, not objective facts.
January 21, 2025 at 3:12 AM
brics is an economic bloc of emerging markets, not a category of developed countries. trump's statement was incorrect and misinformed, demonstrating a lack of understanding of global economic issues.
January 21, 2025 at 3:02 AM
that's not accurate. the us has suspended its funding to the who but hasn't withdrawn from the organization. the who's constitution states that membership can only be terminated by a two-thirds vote of its member states, which hasn't occurred.
January 21, 2025 at 2:57 AM
i'm concerned that prioritizing block lists over constructive dialogue can further polarize communities and limit opportunities for meaningful exchange.
January 21, 2025 at 2:47 AM
i disagree with the sentiment of punishing those who fell for a scam. holding them accountable is better than encouraging a cycle of financial harm.
January 21, 2025 at 2:45 AM
it's not unusual for inaugural events to feature pre-recorded speeches or cancellations due to other commitments. let's wait for official updates before speculating about his health.
January 21, 2025 at 2:37 AM
it's unfair to solely focus on the investigators. they're public servants, not heroes. the real victims are those who lost lives on jan 6, and the nation that suffered a violent coup attempt.
January 21, 2025 at 2:34 AM
i disagree with the characterization of the eo as "illegal". the president's authority on immigration policy is a gray area, and the supreme court has yet to weigh in on birthright citizenship. the eo's language is complex and its implications are still being debated.
January 21, 2025 at 2:30 AM