Amine El Ouassouli
@aelouass.bsky.social
CS / DS / ML / AI (whatever it is called now) Ph.D. Engineer. Past: INSA-Lyon, LIRIS.
Main topics: sequential and temporal data, models and, reasoning.
Currently playing with manufacturing data and, interested in RL and Graph DL.
Main topics: sequential and temporal data, models and, reasoning.
Currently playing with manufacturing data and, interested in RL and Graph DL.
That it’s time-off o’clock.
July 17, 2025 at 9:51 PM
That it’s time-off o’clock.
There is nothing truer than this true statement.
January 31, 2025 at 10:29 AM
There is nothing truer than this true statement.
The more I read and listen to current debates in the field, the more I’m convinced that we have a model evaluation crisis.
January 30, 2025 at 6:23 PM
Seeing “very successful” and “have a somewhat loose relationship with the truth” referring to the same people is what I can’t make sense of …
January 28, 2025 at 8:22 PM
Seeing “very successful” and “have a somewhat loose relationship with the truth” referring to the same people is what I can’t make sense of …
The ToDo list: a revolution.
January 24, 2025 at 2:24 PM
The ToDo list: a revolution.
Est ce qu'on dirait que "la promotion à outrance des mathématiques est idéologique" ? ça laisse entendre que "l'IA" spécifiquement, à forte dose, est une sciences eugénisante par essence. On peut très bien en faire une interprétation/usage "progressiste" même si ce n'est pas dans l'air du temps.
January 20, 2025 at 6:44 PM
Est ce qu'on dirait que "la promotion à outrance des mathématiques est idéologique" ? ça laisse entendre que "l'IA" spécifiquement, à forte dose, est une sciences eugénisante par essence. On peut très bien en faire une interprétation/usage "progressiste" même si ce n'est pas dans l'air du temps.
À mon avis, ce type d’analyse n’aide absolument pas à se faire une opinion. Le « calcul » (parce que c’est ce que c’est au finale) n’est que le calcul. En faire quelque chose d’idéologique par essence est une sur-interprétation biaisée. L’ « IA » elle même ne porte rien du tout.
January 20, 2025 at 5:51 PM
À mon avis, ce type d’analyse n’aide absolument pas à se faire une opinion. Le « calcul » (parce que c’est ce que c’est au finale) n’est que le calcul. En faire quelque chose d’idéologique par essence est une sur-interprétation biaisée. L’ « IA » elle même ne porte rien du tout.
That’s a very good one 👌🏽
January 16, 2025 at 8:48 PM
That’s a very good one 👌🏽
Best: the most useful research you can do in the current context.
Worst: seems that it is not the main focus for now + maybe the pushbacks.
Worst: seems that it is not the main focus for now + maybe the pushbacks.
January 16, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Best: the most useful research you can do in the current context.
Worst: seems that it is not the main focus for now + maybe the pushbacks.
Worst: seems that it is not the main focus for now + maybe the pushbacks.
May the force be with you!
January 16, 2025 at 8:41 PM
May the force be with you!
Is it an outlier, though?
(and one way of coping for me is to listen to MLST to hear more nuanced, or at sounder, views and opinions + reading)
(and one way of coping for me is to listen to MLST to hear more nuanced, or at sounder, views and opinions + reading)
January 16, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Is it an outlier, though?
(and one way of coping for me is to listen to MLST to hear more nuanced, or at sounder, views and opinions + reading)
(and one way of coping for me is to listen to MLST to hear more nuanced, or at sounder, views and opinions + reading)
Basically, IMO, given that all assertions have different degrees of consensus in the population, accurate sequential token prediction may overlap or not with accurate “truth” in the “meaning” or conceptual realm.
January 8, 2025 at 11:31 PM
Basically, IMO, given that all assertions have different degrees of consensus in the population, accurate sequential token prediction may overlap or not with accurate “truth” in the “meaning” or conceptual realm.
The model may represent truthfully what’s in the dataset, even if it is untruthful. An analogy I often use: you don’t decide if evolution exists by popular vote. The vote tells what the population thinks. Research work even if it is coming from a single individual is more relevant in “truthfulness”
January 8, 2025 at 11:27 PM
The model may represent truthfully what’s in the dataset, even if it is untruthful. An analogy I often use: you don’t decide if evolution exists by popular vote. The vote tells what the population thinks. Research work even if it is coming from a single individual is more relevant in “truthfulness”
What is clear for me is that the current hype is not helping the calm development of these methods and collaboration with other fields.
PS: as someone mentioned, cross domain collaboration is key when it comes to ai research. It is hard, but it is key.
PS: as someone mentioned, cross domain collaboration is key when it comes to ai research. It is hard, but it is key.
January 6, 2025 at 7:05 PM
What is clear for me is that the current hype is not helping the calm development of these methods and collaboration with other fields.
PS: as someone mentioned, cross domain collaboration is key when it comes to ai research. It is hard, but it is key.
PS: as someone mentioned, cross domain collaboration is key when it comes to ai research. It is hard, but it is key.
If it is not satisfactory at an epistemological level, it is not always clear at the moment and advances in the field will highlight that later. Is that non-integrity ? I would say no (maybe I’m mistaken).
January 6, 2025 at 7:02 PM
If it is not satisfactory at an epistemological level, it is not always clear at the moment and advances in the field will highlight that later. Is that non-integrity ? I would say no (maybe I’m mistaken).