Adrian Lundberg
@adrianlundberg.bsky.social
Researcher | Teacher | Academic Developer | Multilingualism | Education | Q methodology
Yes, there is work done on generalisability in Q methodology.
In Q, resulting factors provide substantive generalisations about a phenomenon (Thomas and Baas 1993). Ramlo (2024) has also written about non-statistical, substantive generalisation in Q.
Tell me more about your approach. 💡
In Q, resulting factors provide substantive generalisations about a phenomenon (Thomas and Baas 1993). Ramlo (2024) has also written about non-statistical, substantive generalisation in Q.
Tell me more about your approach. 💡
March 6, 2025 at 11:56 AM
Yes, there is work done on generalisability in Q methodology.
In Q, resulting factors provide substantive generalisations about a phenomenon (Thomas and Baas 1993). Ramlo (2024) has also written about non-statistical, substantive generalisation in Q.
Tell me more about your approach. 💡
In Q, resulting factors provide substantive generalisations about a phenomenon (Thomas and Baas 1993). Ramlo (2024) has also written about non-statistical, substantive generalisation in Q.
Tell me more about your approach. 💡
Sounds interesting!
March 6, 2025 at 7:49 AM
Sounds interesting!
Absolutely, like any research approach. Why would you need information on relative prevalence of the identified perspectives?
March 6, 2025 at 5:57 AM
Absolutely, like any research approach. Why would you need information on relative prevalence of the identified perspectives?
Yes, absolutely worth it.
March 6, 2025 at 5:36 AM
Yes, absolutely worth it.
Yes, always a good choice when interested in individuals’ subjective perspectives.
March 6, 2025 at 5:33 AM
Yes, always a good choice when interested in individuals’ subjective perspectives.