Audun Sivertsen
@adnsvrtsn.bsky.social
MD PhD, clinical microbiologist @ Haukeland Uni. Hospital, Bergen, Norway. Research side-hustle, interested in epidemiology, comparative genomics, AMR, HGT, sequencing of isolates and clinical samples in diagnostic endeavors.
Reposted by Audun Sivertsen
When using ARG databases, it is much better to have a low number of false positives, then to identify every gene under the Sun as a potential ARG.
My preferred options are ResFinder and CARD (with the latter having some entries that are probably better considered housekeeping genes)
My preferred options are ResFinder and CARD (with the latter having some entries that are probably better considered housekeeping genes)
August 20, 2025 at 10:29 AM
When using ARG databases, it is much better to have a low number of false positives, then to identify every gene under the Sun as a potential ARG.
My preferred options are ResFinder and CARD (with the latter having some entries that are probably better considered housekeeping genes)
My preferred options are ResFinder and CARD (with the latter having some entries that are probably better considered housekeeping genes)
Likewise! Optimal collaboration environment! A banger!
August 6, 2025 at 7:28 AM
Likewise! Optimal collaboration environment! A banger!